Creation vs. Evolution

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Warthaug:
Exodus 21:7
If a man sells his daughter as a slave she will not leave as male slaves do.

Exodus 21:8
If she does not please her master who intended her for himself he must let her be bought back.

1 Timothy 6:1
All those who are under the yoke of slavery must have unqualified respect for their masters, so that the name of God and our teaching is not brought into disrepute.

1 Timothy 2:9
Slaves must be obedient to their masters in everything, and do what is wanted without argument.

1 Peter 2:18
Slaves, you should obey your masters respectfully, not only those who are kind and reasonable but also those who are difficult to please.

1 Corinthians 7:21
Even if you have a chance of freedom you should prefer to make full use of your condition as a slave.

Bryan

To be honest I just started looking into this so the only real reason I'm responding now is to let you know that I didn't blow it off.

Also, to be honest, most people today use the New Testament refernces you gave in terms of employee/employer relationships so I never really gave it much thought in terms of slavery.

My first impressions are that in exodus we're reading commands given to Hebrews about Hebrew servants. These weren't captured slaves. There were various ways that one could end up a slave but it looks like most had to do with a debt. A person could sell their own services, they could give themselves into service to cover a debt or they might "sell" a child if they could not provide for them thus insuring their survival. The laws in Exodus, governed those master/servant relations.

I think the New Testament, not only addresses that slavery but slavery was common in the Roman and Greek cultures and the slaves were just property (real slaves). The new Testament advice to servants may have been given to those real slaves. The slaves being jews (some being Christians) but the masters possibly Romans (or Greeks?). Notice how all the verses that you quoted are all for servants and none for masters.

Also note Pauls repeated reference to himself as a bond servant of Christ. Slave/free is seen as a picture of bondage to sin vs. freedom in Christ or a slaves service and devotion owed to a master as a model of how we should desire to serve Christ.

Anyway, that's just a first look and some of it might we way off so look for yourself and I'll do more looking too.
 
shakeybrainsurgeon:
Many modern Christians quote the "Bible" when, in fact, Christ rejects much of the Old Testament. The Torah does set out specific laws for earthly behavior which are followed by orthodox Jews but not by Christians. Christianity does not provide much guidance for living an earthly life, unlike islam, Judaism and Hinduism which dictate all aspects of social and personal behavior. Christ says nothing about secular authority other than we should pay taxes (render unto Caesar). This is why Chrisitanity came to dominate western civilization: it has a chameleon-like ability to insinuate itself into many secular cultures since it makes few secular demands on its practioners.

Where did you get the idea that either Jesus or the other New Testament writers reject any of the Old testament? In the synoptic gospels alone Jesus makes many references to the Old Testament. here is a link to one article that lists some of them.
http://biblicalstudies.org.uk/article_jesusot_jenkins.html
the average Catholic goes to church a dozen times a year at best, gets baptized, married and buried in the church, that's about it. Compare that to the rigorous life style demands of Judaism, the dietary constraints, the restrictions on marriage and so on.

I'm not sure what the "average Catholic" has to do with anything. I was raised in the catholic chirch and spent 8 years attending religioue education classes. In all that time, I don't think I held a Bible in my hands even once and I was certainly never encouraged to read the Bible. Many years after no contact with the church, I decided to study the Bible.
As to the role of the Catholic Church, it's true that Protestants diverge in aspects of papal authority, transubstantiation, icon worship and so on. But remember, the new testament, the blueprint for modern Christianity, is a construct of the Catholic Church. In the first two centuries AD, there were hundreds of "gospels" and the church winnowed them down to four. If you wnat to really separate from the catholic dogma, stick to a non-traditional gospel, like that of Thomas, or of Judas. If the catholic church didn't keep alive the story of Christ, who did?

"other gospels" were a problem from day one. If the Catholic church fabricated the gospels or any of the New Testament they should have writen it to better fit Catholic theology. They might have avoided the reformation and it was reading the Bible that lead me to decide that I could not be a Catholic anymore.

I have, of course, spent sometime reading some of the other gospels as well as why they were rejected.

Who kept the story of Christ alive? Mathew, Peter, Luke, James, John, Paul and so on...those who went out and taught and founded churches.

Bertrand Russell laments current Christian theology as 'ferocious": an allegedly benevolent God creates souls out of nothing, makes them weak, lets them dance like marionettes for seventy years on an earth full of temptations, then, if those souls fail to follow his rules, he condemns them to eternal torment...as George Carlin points out: if you sin, you will be put into a world of fire and flesh eating worms forever by a God WHO LOVES YOU. Nonsense.

I doubt I'll be taking any religious instruction from an athiest/agnostic philosopher or a comedian with a foul mouth. LOL

1 Cor 1:18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent."

1Cor 1:22 For Jews request a sign and Greeks seek after wisdom; 23 but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stmbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, 24 but to those who are called both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.
I agree --- the God I believe in must have an infinity capacity for forgiveness, which means no one can be punished forever no matter what they do.

The God of the Bible does one better. He became man to see to the payment for your sins personally.
The gospels, I feel, give an inadequate picture of Christ. Viewed dispassionately, the Christ of the four gospels is a) humorless (and humor is our most human quality) and b) cryptic (if he has only three years to give us the blueprint for a just life, why speak in parables that require complex interpretation). Chrisitan stores sell images of a laughing Christ surrounded by children, but no where in the new testament does Christ laugh. I don't trust people who never laugh or joke.

The gospels never mention Him doing a lot of things that I would assume he must have done. They certainly never say that he didn't laugh. The gospel writer apparently didn't see where it suited their purpose to document laughing episodes.

however, I absolutely think that there was something of a sense of humor in some of Jesus anwers, especially some answers given to authorities.

He didn't always speak in parables and notice that He himself explains some of the parables.

I don't know what to say about Chrisyian stores other than, I don't generally go in them.

He is also a socialist, which is ironic given that Christians tend to be conservative capitalists. He has no use for money, in fact he considers wealth an impediment to salvation. Nevertheless, all Chrisitan denominations are now preoccupied with cash flow... odd.

To say that all Christian denominations are preoccupied with cash flow might be a little hard to back up. But...my choice in a church is a non-denominational church that sticks to the Bible. That isn't easy to find in these days of promis keeper, seeker sensative and purpose driven life/church stuff. So, yes, there is a big move to soften the gospel and apply "modern" customer driven methods to grow churches and a big move to sell books and cd's. Just because the subject is God is not cause to let down your guard and turn idiot. As always, follow the money and take a look at what's going on.

One of the first things they do is avoid discussing Hell (people don't like Hell). Of course, In doing so, they deminish or completely neglect the significance of the cross. They put the emphysis on what you do and how you feel. They tell you other things that you might like to hear like do this, that and the other over 40 days and your career and bank account will grow and you'll be happier...your works are going to make you HAPPY! Of course that isn't at all what the Bible promises but telling people that they are likely to be persecuted for following Christ is no way to grow a church.
 
H2Andy:
i don't mean this in a negative way, but i think we are talking past each other.

you believe in a supernatural being that will give you eternal life and i don't.

i am not sure we can discuss what it means to be a good human being on the same level.

Yep, I got that. LOL
 
Soggy,
You said and others have too,
I don't believe in god, yet I manage to live a moral life.

Really? By whose standards, yours? If so, I suppose you do. I, myself, am a perfect being according to me! Oh, wait a minute. Andy said no one is perfect.....now I'm all mixed up,,,

Moral relativism is what I'm reading here and some other issues as well.

Later you said,

If a sin is a sin and sins are defined by god's commandments, then murder and thievery are no different...both will put you in hell for eternity if not repented by accepting Christ (whatever that means) before you die.

That would be a correct statement. God does not rank sins. You are either guilty or you are not. You see, being the one who created all, He sets the standards, not us.


Imagine if I tried that in a courtroom....but Judge, I wasn't breaking my own personal standards. How do you think that would go over?

Is there absolute right and wrong? Yes there is.

What would really be the harm if you sat down in a quiet place and really thought this out?

Is life on this planet really just some type of accident that just sorta happened? Just think about it, does that make any sense at all? regardless as to what scientists may tell you, does it really fit in to what you know the truth is?

Let me make a quick point here, I was not always a Christian, so I can relate to some of the things that are being brought out. It's hard I'll grant that.

If life here is just some cosmic accident, then what would be the point?

....To just exist!?
 
sandjeep:
Soggy,
If life here is just some cosmic accident, then what would be the point?

To pick fun at Sandjeep, point, and giggle at him? :freak:
 
sandjeep:
That would be a correct statement. God does not rank sins. You are either guilty or you are not. You see, being the one who created all, He sets the standards, not us.

I find the idea of a god who sees no difference in snitching a piece of gum and killing 6,000,000 people to simply not be credible. I feel a little sorry for people who share such a poor standard.
 
sandjeep:
Really? By whose standards, yours? If so, I suppose you do. I, myself, am a perfect being according to me! Oh, wait a minute. Andy said no one is perfect.....now I'm all mixed up,,,

I did not say perfect, I said a moral life. I am moral to my own standards, as well as those of the society I live in. I have done a fair amount of study about ethics and my moral philosophy is the one that I believe holds up to logical debate the best. I admit to making moral mistakes and I try not to repeat them. I treat others how I would prefer to be treated and try not to harm anyone.

You see, being the one who created all, He sets the standards, not us.

That is an opinion. Do not confuse it with a statement of fact. I disagree.

What would really be the harm if you sat down in a quiet place and really thought this out?

You think I haven't?! That's almost insulting....It is a topic I have spent significant amount of time thinking about and have gone from agnostic to athiestic as a result of spending that time thinking, reading, and learning.

Is life on this planet really just some type of accident that just sorta happened? Just think about it, does that make any sense at all? regardless as to what scientists may tell you, does it really fit in to what you know the truth is?

Yup, it makes a lot of sense. What exactly do I know the truth to be?

What doesn't make sense is denying observable truths in favor of supernatural explanations.

If life here is just some cosmic accident, then what would be the point?

....To just exist!?

Who says there is a point to it? I sure don't believe there is. I am just another animal on this planet that happened to develop increased cognitive abilities as a method of survival where others developed wings, or claws, or the ability to see in the dark. Don't make things more complicated than they are.
 
No human was present at the dawn of our universe to tell us what happened, objectively.

None of us was around to observe creation or evolution. Transitional fossils have yet to be found. Since science is based upon observation, this leaves a huge blindspot.

So, one really has to start with their favored presupposition and build from there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom