conservatism of computers?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

simbrooks

Snr LayZboy Meteorologist
ScubaBoard Supporter
Messages
7,352
Reaction score
15
Location
Orlando, Fl
# of dives
100 - 199
When i have been looking into computers to buy, i was left wondering which manufacturers use which bubble models. I have no real idea of how conservative these models are compared to one another and therefore which computer would give me a more conservative readout (all other aspects of the dive being equal).

Any quick and dirty way of knowing which models are more/less conservative and which manufacturers use them? I really know nothing of these types of devices having only dove tables so far. I would not like to go out and buy x or y computer to find that it is going to cut my time short or leave me in the water so long that others are going into deco mode.

I am pretty much only talking of algorithms here, not other features. I would like one that is nitrox compatible, but that is secondary to the time allowed at depth by the model algorithm. I have been diving the PADI RDP so far and was told that it is one of the more liberal tables out there, which got me thinking along these lines.

Simon
 
This won't answer your question, but a buddy of mine and I were comparing our respective computer's planning pages for the same dive.

He dives a Suunto Vytec, and I dive an Oceanic VT Pro. His computer is a little more conservative than mine. Planning EAN32 at 1.6 PO2, his computer gave him a max depth of 130 and mine gave me 132. At a planned max depth of 130, his computer gave him 12 minutes and mine gave me 14 minutes.

We both had our alarm limits set at DECO.

I had heard that the Suunto's use a more conservative model.
 
The really big differences between computers will show up on repetitive dives, especially those with short surface intervals. By the way, the Oceanic will give a lot of no-stop time, but will run up very long mandatory stops if taken beyond the no-stop limits.

Some of the more liberal computers available which are also useful if going beyond the no stop limits would be:

Aladin Pro Ultra
Benemec (sold under many brands including Sea Elite, Polar, Buddy and Zeagle, can be had for as little as $200)
Cochran

If you are used to having long bottom times, Suunto computers will drive you nuts, unless you want to dive nitrox all the time.
 
leadweight:
Oceanic will give a lot of no-stop time, but will run up very long mandatory stops if taken beyond the no-stop limits.

Yep. I ran into this on a search about a month ago. I never have enough gas if the Oceanic goes red! :))
 
Most computer manufacturers put a description of the model they use and the 1st dive NDL's in the back of the user manuals. Check the manuals on the following websites:
- www.diveaeris.com (Oceanic, Sherwood, Genesis use the same)
- www.suunto.com
- www.uwatec.com

Aeris the most liberal.
:snorkel:ScubaRon
 

Back
Top Bottom