To be fair I think most manufacturers are honest in stating each models flow rate.
Or at least try to give an honest answer to the question.
What is difficult is the differences between "Standard pressure and temperature" to either European or America referenced standards.
Here's the link:
Standard conditions for temperature and pressure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hence for scuba the filling or charging rate, time from 500 to 3000 psi is given for filling an 11 litre (80cfm) cylinder at 21C (70F)
ambient is a simpler means to compare like for like.
What is also not properly understood with compressor potential purchasers is the huge differences when it comes to work load and service life
and the huge difference in compression ratios, piston diameters, rod loadings, RPM and piston stroke for each of the various makes and models
available when claiming the same flow.
Further the design "balance" of a model should be based on number of matched diameter stages over each pistons compression ratio for a given
discharge pressure and flow. Calculated against the gas inlet and discharge temperature and a balanced rod load including calculating in flow and blow-by.
Not just the "catalogue knowledge' of how long to fill a scuba tank.
Sadly what you get is the cheap fix of available parts cobbled together to make the biggest "bang" for the cheapest "buck" with huge interstage
rod load differences and temperatures.
Also by way of example it should be the actual calculated gas temperature at the discharge valve that should be disclosed, being always much
greater than that "measured" surface or "skin" temperature at say the discharge tubing due to heat losses and dissipation.
For example I use an industrial design compressor (not a scuba model) a 38 scfm flow gas compressor 4 stage fully balanced 4 inch stroke at a low 440 RPM
for a 2755 psi discharge pressure with a 116 psig inlet pressure. Using 14.73BHP to produce 38 SCFM at 2755 psig
Using a Gas inlet temp of 122F and an ambient air temperature of 99F
Piston diameters for a 2.2 compression ratio (1.99 on the 4th stage at 2755 psi)
1st 2.63" @272.84 psig
2nd 1.75" @617.89 psig
3rd 1.13" @ 1376.99 psig
4th 0.75" @ 2755 psig
Gas temp and Rod loadings
1st 269.05 F @1475.83 lbs
2nd 265.29 F @1334.43 lbs
3rd 265.19 F @1242.37 lbs
4th 244.82 F @1222.55 lbs
Compression ratio is finely tuned at 2.25, 2.42. 2.24 and 1.73
You can also see the fine balanced design and that the 4th stage to balance out needs a higher discharge pressure of 3000 psi than 2755 psi
Now if you change the design scope and say make it a three stage
1st 2.63" @429.68 psig
2nd 1.38" @1051.81 psig
3rd 0.88" @ 2755 psig
Gas temp and Rod loadings
1st 365.61 F @2324.2 lbs
2nd 277.13 F @1561.04 lbs
3rd 293.93 F @1655.8 lbs
You can see the compression ratio is all over the place at 3.64, 2.47 and 2.35 and the temperature range is greater.
Now the same calculations on most of our scuba models would give very surprising results.
With gas temperatures and rod loadings not for the faint hearted.
IMHO most scuba models are designed for a short hard life. Do the maths. Iain Middlebrook