RonR
Contributor
Yes, Atomic is now doing all recall inspections themselves in house, as there have been a few instances of Cobalts being missed.
Thanks for the compliments on the UI- our goal in developing the Cobalt, starting many years back now, was to make a computer that was designed from the user’s perspective. It’s hard to make something easy to use, particularly when it has as many features as the Cobalt. And most UI’s are designed to make things easy for the engineers, not the end users. But we are both dedicated UI geeks, and Atomic saw the benefits of the design for their first computer. Of course, all that effort is moot if it leaks or components fail. Atomic, to their credit, has moved rapidly to fix issues with the case and has provided great customer service. Whenever one goes back for service, as your wife’s needs to, it will be upgraded with all the improvements.
I have heard of the SAUL algorithm, but I can’t say I am familiar with it. I am sympathetic to the idea of expressing results in terms of probability and risk, as I think much misunderstanding of what dive computers say is due to treating an analog problem like decompression as if it has a simple binary solution (deco/ no-deco). The Cobalt was always designed to be able to handle multiple algorithms, and that is one thing we are looking at for the future.
Looks as if you are local to us- let me know if I can help in any way. I’ll PM you with contact info.
-Ron
Thanks for the compliments on the UI- our goal in developing the Cobalt, starting many years back now, was to make a computer that was designed from the user’s perspective. It’s hard to make something easy to use, particularly when it has as many features as the Cobalt. And most UI’s are designed to make things easy for the engineers, not the end users. But we are both dedicated UI geeks, and Atomic saw the benefits of the design for their first computer. Of course, all that effort is moot if it leaks or components fail. Atomic, to their credit, has moved rapidly to fix issues with the case and has provided great customer service. Whenever one goes back for service, as your wife’s needs to, it will be upgraded with all the improvements.
I have heard of the SAUL algorithm, but I can’t say I am familiar with it. I am sympathetic to the idea of expressing results in terms of probability and risk, as I think much misunderstanding of what dive computers say is due to treating an analog problem like decompression as if it has a simple binary solution (deco/ no-deco). The Cobalt was always designed to be able to handle multiple algorithms, and that is one thing we are looking at for the future.
Looks as if you are local to us- let me know if I can help in any way. I’ll PM you with contact info.
-Ron