CO problem in tanks

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Hey tbone, I don't understand the chemistry. CO is produced because of incomplete oxydation of fuel. Do you mind explaining how CO is formed from salt water in an aluminum tank?

It happens when the fill operator realizes that someone is going to get sued.

It's probably a reaction between saltwater and panic. Since panic can't be detected with normal instrumentation and can be teleported, some tanks contain it even though they appear not to.

flots.
 
I think it's more of a reaction from the algae that may have been present in there unless they had inadvertently PP blended in there and a small reaction occurred. I was just looking through and the chemistry doesn't work without lots of heat. Some metabolic reactions produce CO, so it could very well have been the algae in that specific sea water.
http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/ne...-bad-air-originating-tank-not-compressor.html
exhaustive thread there. Either way, I'm much more concerned from the compressor than originating in the tank unless PP blending which I don't do with Oxygen, only helium.
 
Yes, I could not find anything that would explain how corrosion would generate CO. The link from grf88 is very interesting. In this long presentation, only one area mentioned CO in the tank. However, it looks like that the "control" tanks also had CO in it. So again, CO was already present and independent of tank corrosion.

The most surprising finding, however, was the residual gas analysis. The gas in the steel cylinder had very abnormal values: oxygen was significantly reduced (15.0%), carbon monoxide was elevated (10 ppm) but carbon dioxide was normal (0.01%). The Law of Thermodynamics predicts that such a drop in oxygen content would be associated with the production of 1.5 pounds of rust, which agrees well with what was found inside of the cylinder. The cylinder should have also lost 150 psig to oxidation, but the cylinder dropped only 80 psig. This discrepancy was felt to be within the error limits of the small-faced pressure gauges that were used. For comparison, the gas analyses in two matched aluminum cylinders were normal (20.9% oxygen, 3.0-3.5 ppm carbon monoxide and 0.03% carbon dioxide).

Even at 10 PPM of CO is not enough to cause a serious CO poisoning.
 

Back
Top Bottom