Us lawyers are always looking for the company that has the deapest pokets in the case. They are not looking for faults, only settlement with a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
I will give you one exemple. I worked for a medical implantable device company some 15/20 years ago. in order to be fixed ( sewed ?) in the body, the devices had to be "framed" with some synthetic material made by a giant chemical company. Well this company wrote to every medical device companies that they would stop the sale of such a product within a few years. The reason: it was a very very small part of their business and it was too big a risk in terms of potential liability
Aren't we living in a beautiful world?
I will give you one exemple. I worked for a medical implantable device company some 15/20 years ago. in order to be fixed ( sewed ?) in the body, the devices had to be "framed" with some synthetic material made by a giant chemical company. Well this company wrote to every medical device companies that they would stop the sale of such a product within a few years. The reason: it was a very very small part of their business and it was too big a risk in terms of potential liability
Aren't we living in a beautiful world?