I was playing with my hero2 in protune mode and cineform and getting frustrated with it for the lack of controls
Anyway I tried the low, medium and high quality settings and that results in different conversion bitrate, as they are variable no point measuring but the scale was 7,11,14
The files when playing with cineform and quicktime were showing by default with the protune mode so looking pretty crap
If I go in cineform and I set the preset to none as Marty was suggesting I get a flatter image
So now I was wondering how cineform compares with iMovie that uses apple intermediate codec
Not sure if anyone has noticed but if you import from gopro to iMovie in optimised mode that converts to apple intermediate codec you end up with a flat profile clip very similar to cineform with protune NONE, bitrate similar to cineform in low quality
If you do the same with final cut pro it uses prores and ends up with bitrate similar to the medium and high of cineform with flat profile at the start
I could not tell the difference between the low, medium and high with a flat profile! Actually I would say that apple intermediate codec looked similar if not more natural than cineform and likewise no real improvements with fcpx either
This is expected as those are intermediate production codecs not viewing ones however for me the conclusion is that cineform main feature is the ability to white balance by key frames in terms of grading it does not add any real value compared to what the apple products do themselves
This is because the original file is anyway a 4:2:0 H264 so even if you increase the bitrate there are no significant improvements
So if you shoot in short clips and don't correct by key frame you can skip cineform from your workflow, if instead you shoot a whole dive with out pre-cutting then cineform may be an option
I would be curious to hear from other mac users if they have made any comparisons
Anyway I tried the low, medium and high quality settings and that results in different conversion bitrate, as they are variable no point measuring but the scale was 7,11,14
The files when playing with cineform and quicktime were showing by default with the protune mode so looking pretty crap
If I go in cineform and I set the preset to none as Marty was suggesting I get a flatter image
So now I was wondering how cineform compares with iMovie that uses apple intermediate codec
Not sure if anyone has noticed but if you import from gopro to iMovie in optimised mode that converts to apple intermediate codec you end up with a flat profile clip very similar to cineform with protune NONE, bitrate similar to cineform in low quality
If you do the same with final cut pro it uses prores and ends up with bitrate similar to the medium and high of cineform with flat profile at the start
I could not tell the difference between the low, medium and high with a flat profile! Actually I would say that apple intermediate codec looked similar if not more natural than cineform and likewise no real improvements with fcpx either
This is expected as those are intermediate production codecs not viewing ones however for me the conclusion is that cineform main feature is the ability to white balance by key frames in terms of grading it does not add any real value compared to what the apple products do themselves
This is because the original file is anyway a 4:2:0 H264 so even if you increase the bitrate there are no significant improvements
So if you shoot in short clips and don't correct by key frame you can skip cineform from your workflow, if instead you shoot a whole dive with out pre-cutting then cineform may be an option
I would be curious to hear from other mac users if they have made any comparisons