ChrisA
Contributor
biscuit7:Actually, that's only one of the 3 reasons to use nitrox over air. The other two are to reduce surface interval or increase the margin of safety by diving a nitrox mix using air tables.
In recreational diving, the oxygen exposure issue is almost non-existent. OTUs are really only a problem with extended periods of time on very rich mixtures.
Well... I'm not sure what maximum partial pressure you're calculating, but 107' is the MOD for 32% at ppO2 of 1.4 which is a pretty standard mix. If you're using 30% or 28% you can get an MOD that's deeper, no problem.
I figured banked 32% would be the norm I get 111 feet for an MOD but still I figured most divers would plan to stay above 100 feet hence my coment. Yes you could get some .28 ad go to 130 but is this a practical option on a boat? Can they custom blend?
As for shortening SI. That is just the other side of longer NDL. It's like adding air to a beer botle by drinking the beer the two are stuck tightly together. Actually if you do take full advantage of the longer NDL SI will work out to about the same. OK sometimes you run out of gas before reaching NDL. Or if you choose an SI so that you can have a 30min botom time you SI will be shorter but if you ...
Simplest way to think of it is that if the mix has less nitrogen in it you will have lower nitrogen exposure for the same llenght of dive so you add saftey and shorter SI But if you stay down
longer you will breath more gass even if that gas has less nitrogen so what you gain is
longerbottom times Either way it is still a "win" and worth doing
PADI recently removed the part about nitrox being "safer" from the class materials. It seems there is no statistical difference. While it seems lke it should be safer but in order to make the claim you would have to observe a lowered rate of dive acidents and this was not the case. Accident rates are the same.
Argument is silly. Everyone knows that doing repetitive dives on a live abord is THE clasic example of a situation where nitrox is helpfull