Wow, guys, this seems to have descended into an argument. I haven't read the past half dozen or so argumentative posts, but now that you guys are expanding the, uh, discussion beyond that DM with that group in that video to what any of us might do on any dive, this is what I do.
On a dive that has been planned as a classic OW dive, where there is no real or virtual overhead, minimal equipment, etc., I would follow the textbook OW procedure and secure an air source, then ascend to the surface without undue delay. I would like to believe this is ingrained in muscle memory from practice. I wouldn't intentionally complicate things even if I felt confident I could solve the problem underwater. As I mentioned earlier, the thinking is that small problems, er, inconveniences, can compound into bigger problems that I may not be prepared to handle. So long as surfacing is an option, better for me to simply deal with the small problem immediately, on the surface.
On a dive that has been planned on the premise that I cannot always make a direct ascent to the surface, then I would try to solve the problem underwater. Solving problems is part of the plan. I would probably have the redundant equipment for that. The muscle memory for handling the problem is matched with the equipment.
Sure, there is the rare OW dive in which something happens that prevents a direct ascent, such as entanglement. We obviously have to handle that as best we can. I make great efforts to avoid putting myself in such a situation. If it's planned as an OW dive, I dive conservatively to keep it an OW dive.
In summary, I try to take advantage of that essential characteristic of an OW dive. It's the beauty of OW diving. I can relax and save my technical skills for when I really need them and know I have the equipment to apply them to.
That's just me. Not arguing anyone should do what I do. YMMV. Etc. Etc.
On a dive that has been planned as a classic OW dive, where there is no real or virtual overhead, minimal equipment, etc., I would follow the textbook OW procedure and secure an air source, then ascend to the surface without undue delay. I would like to believe this is ingrained in muscle memory from practice. I wouldn't intentionally complicate things even if I felt confident I could solve the problem underwater. As I mentioned earlier, the thinking is that small problems, er, inconveniences, can compound into bigger problems that I may not be prepared to handle. So long as surfacing is an option, better for me to simply deal with the small problem immediately, on the surface.
On a dive that has been planned on the premise that I cannot always make a direct ascent to the surface, then I would try to solve the problem underwater. Solving problems is part of the plan. I would probably have the redundant equipment for that. The muscle memory for handling the problem is matched with the equipment.
Sure, there is the rare OW dive in which something happens that prevents a direct ascent, such as entanglement. We obviously have to handle that as best we can. I make great efforts to avoid putting myself in such a situation. If it's planned as an OW dive, I dive conservatively to keep it an OW dive.
In summary, I try to take advantage of that essential characteristic of an OW dive. It's the beauty of OW diving. I can relax and save my technical skills for when I really need them and know I have the equipment to apply them to.
That's just me. Not arguing anyone should do what I do. YMMV. Etc. Etc.