Diving with a camera is a privilege not a right. A setup of that size and complexity is not for you. Just being honest. Even a point and shoot is too much of a distraction. get 50-100 dives under your belt then worry about getting a camera.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
...I'll point out another reason to wait . . . you're gonna take crummy pictures.
Guys,
I'm looking for some advice on controlling buoyancy with camera gear when you do this for the first time. As some know I'm a fairly inexperienced diver (15dives so far, all with an instructor accompanying me).
I realise buoyancy control will be bad when you handle a camera under water for the first time.
my setup is an epl5 with nauticam housing, 6" nauticam dome for the 7-14 panny, and two inon Z240's attached via inon 20cm float arms (medium size). Note TTL when I got my rig, I told the seller I wanted the unit to be slightly negatively buoyant.
any advice?
Wow, first post I read here after a trip taking pictures and spitting through my reg.I suggest you start out taking photo's whilst kneeling on sand. This way your buoyancy is not an issue and you can practice your photography without the added difficulty of maintaining hovering buoyancy which is NOT easy
Guys,
I'm looking for some advice on controlling buoyancy with camera gear when you do this for the first time. As some know I'm a fairly inexperienced diver (15dives so far, all with an instructor accompanying me).
I realise buoyancy control will be bad when you handle a camera under water for the first time.
my setup is an epl5 with nauticam housing, 6" nauticam dome for the 7-14 panny, and two inon Z240's attached via inon 20cm float arms (medium size). Note TTL when I got my rig, I told the seller I wanted the unit to be slightly negatively buoyant.
any advice?