Everyone on here but YOU clearly say both are at fault but you!! However you are providing everyone with much amusement here
Yes I can see that you and the mostly pub crawler crew like to have recent viewers believe that, but many of you have also said that even though the AG
was run down it was their fault because of their actions earlier in the day, so what you are saying here is the same circular argument most of you have been using.
1. the AG with premeditation suicidally rammed the unsuspecting Whaler.
2. if they didn't and really did get rammed by the whaler it's still their fault for harassing them earlier in the day.
What I have been saying is in the minutes leading up to and including the collision, the Whaler is obviously the aggressor and is guilty of numerous violations of maritime law.
The long version of the video shot from the AG is the most damning, but I also posted a link to a three way split screen video with all the video evidence running in sinc.
I am not the only person in this thread who sees it this way, but not surprisingly none of the following members frequents the pub to the same extent as most of the SS faulters.
I will list post #'s where their stand on the ramming is made clear; some members slowly show their hand over the course of a few posts; post 310 is when the first long video from the AG is introduced to this thread.
cdreamer - posts 310, 318, 320, 344, 359
Wookie - 313, 325
mfinley - 386
Doc Harry - 390, 419, 467, 555
DCBC - 473, 562, 564, 570, 581
I am honored to stand with this group who are not afraid to call it like they see it. I am only here for my own entertainment; I have never been to the pub and now I don't have to go to see how one can have 10 times the posts than dives and e3ven more thanks.
