I said nothing about Leisure pro. Leisure Pro is a discount *Reseller* I'm talking about Manufacturer direct. Tobin
What large manufacturers in Europe primarily sell direct to the end user? None that I know of. That is what my original post was about. You are talking about manufacturer direct. I was the one that said Leisure Pro dragged the big manufacturers into the internet age kicking and screaming.
As for how more people increased profits that is simple: Profit = margin x sales. So profit will increase if the increase in sales outweighs the decrease in margin. Probably Chris, formerly of HOG, would be a better one to ask. Certainly he could have set HOG up as direct sales but chose to go through dealers. He must have saw some value in it.
Who makes the dealer agreement the LDS or the manufacturer? Who sets minimum orders and yearly volumes? Sorry but Scubapro has much more pull over a Beaver Divers than Beaver Divers has over Scubapro.
My take on Oceanic is that Oceanic was supposed to be the "premium" line, Aeris the "value" line and Hollis the "tech" line. I see a few problems with this approach, first Oceanic was never considered a "premium" line, like Scubapro or Atomic. Second, the lines between "tech" and "recreational" are blurred. This is what happens when you let marketers run amok and have redundant brands. However, your point was that existing contracts and sales models prohibited direct sales. I showed you one method of getting out of this legacy arrangement. BTW, OMS is coming back.
As far as stocking goes you are missing the point. It is far more advantageous (cheaper) for the manufacturer to have the dealer stock the inventory and incur the carrying costs rather than have a central warehouse incurring the carrying costs and paying someone to do distribution. As for stocking dealers, the dealers stock what is popular (easy to sell) and high margin, which is also what manufacturers want. I have never been to a dive shop without any inventory.
---------- Post added March 11th, 2015 at 09:15 AM ----------
True. But consumer protection laws in some countries effectively restrict what controls the manufacturers can exercise over retailers. That is why LP was able to purchase grey market goods from some foreign markets and the mfgrs were unable to stop it. Some also may require that parts be made available to the end consumer.
As Tobin mentioned, there is the "European system" primarily internet sales and the "American system" primarily LDS sales. My point is this, given that in the US a manufacturer could voluntarily adopt to use the "European system" and sell primarily through the internet. The easiest way to do this would be to drop MAP pricing (which I believe is against EU rules).
My understanding that LP bought goods internationally but also purchased surplus inventory from US dive shops that were struggling to meet the requirements of their dealership agreements. I miss the wheeling and dealing days of old.