Thanks Nudibranco and Storker for your advice. Just spent an hour in the pool (28C in water and 30C ambient. Sorry Storker couldn't resist) with new Canon 500D (their designation for a +2 diopter) on my 9-18 Olympus, Em1 and Zen WA100 dome. Was never happy with lens at low apertures @ 9mm. Did some comprehensive comparisons with and without filter from f5.6 to f22 at 9 mm. Will do some more tests later on to see how it performs at 18mm.
The Canon 500d is a high quality multicoated 2 element 52 mm filter that does not vignette @ 9mm. I am pleased to say that there are NO additional chromatic aberrations on the corners at all apertures tested. In addition, there is no loss of image quality in the centre when viewed at 100%. In fact there seamed to be a very slight increase in centre sharpness up to f11. The only negative is that the filter slightly decreases the angle of view. On land it gives the 9mm an equivalent view to the 10.5mm setting. I am not sure if this also contributes to the dramatic increases in corner sharpness I am about to describe, as the lens has always performed better at the longer focal lengths. As mentioned previously corner sharpness has always been a problem at wide apertures. The +2diopter did not entirely remove the softness in the extreme corners, but it did help considerably across the majority of the frame. I was able to achieve almost the same corner sharpness at F5.6 with the filter as I previously achieved at F11 without the filter. For me, I am now comfortable using the lens at f5.6 & f8 and resorting to F11 when sharpness is required across most of the frame. At f16 and f22 there is no increase in sharpness on the corners as the whole image becomes softer due to diffraction. So far it appears to be almost a two stop increase in corner sharpness at 9mm. If it does not adversely affect the 18 mm end then I will be leaving it on all the time. Further testing will tell. At US$57.00 from Japan, it was money well spent.