Best Alternate Lens For Shark Diving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

mwall04

Contributor
Scuba Instructor
Divemaster
Messages
90
Reaction score
109
Location
St. Croix, US Virgin Islands
# of dives
1000 - 2499
Took a trip down to Guadalupe Island last year for great white shark diving and brought along my D90 in an Aquatica housing and my Tokina 10-17 lens. Although it was my first experience with underwater photography, I was overall pleased with my output. Still have a lot of room to improve, but that gives me a great excuse for more trips.

From a camera/lens perspective, my only complaint was that the wide angle of the Tokina left me missing for a longer lens when the sharks were right up on the cage. Without a lot of post-dive editing to crop in tighter on the sharks, the dramatic impact of their real size was lost.

I know the usual answer for this problem is to get closer to your subject, but I can tell you without hesitation that I'm staying in the cage when diving with great white sharks. The boat crew can work to bring the sharks in closer, but what I really need is a longer lens.

As an alternate to the Tokina 10-17 FE, what lens would you recommend to get "closer" to large creatures?



 
The Sigma 10-20mm or the Nikon 10-24mm are both good option, the Sigma has a good reputation for performance underwater, both would benefit from a 8" (or larger) dome port, but both could be used to some extend with the 6", albeit with lower corner performance due to the smaller radius. if you have the 6" already, I would give it a try, since on average, Shark shots tend to have nothing more than blue water in the corner, then again, if you are getting a longer lens its most likely that you want to fill the frame with more meat!

Cheers and stay in the cage and off the food chain ;)
 
...

From a camera/lens perspective, my only complaint was that the wide angle of the Tokina left me missing for a longer lens when the sharks were right up on the cage. Without a lot of post-dive editing to crop in tighter on the sharks, the dramatic impact of their real size was lost.

I know the usual answer for this problem is to get closer to your subject, but I can tell you without hesitation that I'm staying in the cage when diving with great white sharks. The boat crew can work to bring the sharks in closer, but what I really need is a longer lens.

As an alternate to the Tokina 10-17 FE, what lens would you recommend to get "closer" to large creatures?

....

You're a brave man!

I go along with others, the Nikon 10-24 might be just the ticket. But also look at a teleconverter. This will effectively lengthen your lens, with a loss of brightness. Make sure to get a teleconverter that is compatible with your lens, since as I recall the latest Nikons are not, but other makers' are. Confusion!

If you are traveling, saving the weight of another lens, gear and port might be worth considering.
 

Back
Top Bottom