I agree with wlo93 in that it is personal preference. Read all the pros and cons for both.
My preference having owned the Genesis Phantom first I really enjoyed the use of it for the first little while until I had my first issue.
I was diving at a depth of 62 feet on the day in question when all of the sudden I felt myself starting to acend to the surface. Being that it was 65 feet I was not ascending to quickly but non the less I tried to let any air out of the BCD of which there was none.
Along side my buddy for the dive I was able to fin over to the bow line and control my assent to the surface. I stayed at the 15 ft mark for 5 minutes rather than 3 and my bottom time was well within the decompression limits.
So here is the reason why I ascended......One of my weight pockets was held in the BCD using velcro. With close to 60 or so dives on the BCD the velcro pocket had worn out and dropped out onto the lakebed leaving me about 8 lbs lighter......
Moral of this little story is that within 3 months I had looked into the use of a weight system that does not use velcro. After lots of looking around and reading I spent the money on the Zeagle 911 BCD.
One hundred & fifty dives (approx) later and I have never regretted the buying of the Zeagle system. I had also found that with the Genesis I was not as horizontal as I am with the back inflation system.
The weight system in zeagle, depending on the model comes with all snaps and buckles along with the "rip cord" style weight release. I opted to have no cumberbun as it had velcro. In this year (2003/04) the velcro is less and less.
With optional crotch straps and modular components this BCD can accomidate a double tank if you wish it too. Options for both the 45 or 65 lb bladder are also available....
I have had no regrets and my plan is to replace it with the same BCD. If you would like to look at the Zeagle Systems that are available please look at their website
http://www.zeagle.com
If you have any questions about it please contact me.
Safe Diving,