Thanks for the videos. The latter does look brighter to me. Often I find figures brightness/power level confusing, and not necessarily as expected as it claims.
It is important to understand a few things:
- Many manufacturers state a lumen output that is, well, falsely inflated.
- Lumen output is the total output. If two lights have the same lumen output, but one has a wider beam than the other, then one will illuminate a small area more brightly, and the other will illuminate a bigger area but not as brightly.
- a narrower beam will make it easier to see something far away, if the water has any significant amount of particulate in it. A wider beam will light up the particulate in front of your face. The glare from that makes it harder to see. In gin clear water, a wider beam obviously lights up more of your target.
- Candela or candlepower is a different way of measuring light. In simple terms (for ease of understanding), it is the number of lumens per square inch on the target. So, our two identical lights, except for beam angle, will put out the same number of lumens. But, the wider beam will be a lower candela because the lumens are spread over a larger area. The narrower beam will be a higher candela. Even though they are both putting out the same total amount of light (lumens). Most manufacturers tell you lumens output and beam angle. Some choose to give candela in their specs. Those seem to often not give lumens or beam angle. That makes it hard to compare lights.
In the end, I think manufacturer's false claims of lumens output is the biggest contributor to "brightness" being "not necessarily as expected".
And, not understanding how lumens output and beam angle work together to produce a certain brightness (aka candela) is the second biggest contributor to that confusion. A 2000 lumen output in a 90 degree beam will NOT appear as bright as a 1000 lumen output in a 6 degree beam.
Apologies if that was just stating a bunch of stuff you already knew.