Kevrumbo
Banned
- Messages
- 5,659
- Reaction score
- 1,366
- # of dives
- 1000 - 2499
It's whatever units the local divers practice & utiilize --in the Indo-Pacific regions that I've been traveling to for nearly fifteen years now, i'm always buddied-up with Asian or European Divers, hence the usage & preference of the Metric System. That, and as you already know --it is much easier and more intuitive to plan & manage gas usage both pre-dive and during the dive using the Metric System, for both recreational and tech diving.So, Kevrumbo what's the inside here - that the Pacific/Asia dive market is metric or just the tec side of the Pacific?
I am curious as to the imperial/metric use by the hard-core GUI/DIR divers, both in the USA and elsewhere - which metric do they favor and how does their emphasis on standardization work with these divergent measurement standards?
My thought is that metric is far more intuitive than imperial - particularly for diving - and that the learning curve for imperial-to-metric is quickly mastered. I would much rather use metric than imperial/psi/cuft - only the USA/CARIB imperial usage gives me pause.
The dual unit SPG will help the transitioning US imperial trained diver over to the Metric System, graphically showing how superfluous that extra zero/order of magnitude of the PSI measurement can be compared to a pressure reading in Bar.
For Peter & Lynne in the Philippines, this is probably not so much a big issue since they are a long time buddy-team used to practicing with US Imperial Units. . .