Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Agree for sure. My only possible disagreement with you is I don't think anyone (barring the one in a million) has the brain development (concrete vs. abstract) to be safe enough in a true emergency before the age of 15. Not a matter at all of "maturity" or being at the "odd" age. I base that on all my years teaching both mature and immature kids aged 11-12, and on what I recall I was like at 14 vs. 15.Every kid is different. It is impossibly to generalise.
For some, definitely it is wise to suspend their diving activity until they mature enough.
Someone NEVER mature...
I don’t disagree with that. Depending on the definition of emergency. Minor problems or full blown rescue of another diver. Minor problems can be handled by some, but certainly not all under 15. Full rescue? Unlikely.Agree for sure. My only possible disagreement with you is I don't think anyone (barring the one in a million) has the brain development (concrete vs. abstract) to be safe enough in a true emergency before the age of 15.
I agree with you completely. For sure, some "not so dire" emergencies could be handled by a lot of young kids. I also agree that a full blown one is another story, and that many adults would freeze up as well. I am no expert on panic, being lucky so far in 18 years to have not come close to that myself. I do get concerned when a 12 year old panics when buddy mom or dad needs help with the result being fatal. That kid has to live with that forever. And both the kid and parent could be new divers, certified in the same course.I don’t disagree with that. Depending on the definition of emergency. Minor problems or full blown rescue of another diver. Minor problems can be handled by some, but certainly not all under 15. Full rescue? Unlikely.
But, I’d expand that to most adults as well. When faced with an actual emergency. Most adults just don’t know what to do. Not including events with my kids, I’ve been involved in at least 6 emergency response situations in the past 10 years or so. Two in the water, one involving a diver. Except for the diver, every other one included witnesses and onlookers that were effectively paralyzed, and utterly no help.
The diver situation was unique, and the odds were definitely stacked in her favor. Of the 5 people involved in the rescue, at least 4 were trained in EFR, CPR, and at least one (possibly two) was an EFR/CPR instructor. It went so smoothly that another instructor actually commented to his students that we were doing a Rescue course. I don’t expect things to go that smoothly in any emergency situation ever again.
It’s not just young kids that are effectively useless in emergencjes.
Most adults just don’t know what to do.
How much of that is a matter of training and instruction, though? It reminds me of something I saw on TV news many years ago. Someone had fallen through ice, and you saw at least ten people, one by one, walking out to try to save them and of course falling in themselves. It just flabbergasted me -- many years earlier than that, I had seen the illustration in my Boy Scout Handbook of Scouts belly crawling as a human chain, each one holding the ankles of the one in front. I was yelling at the TV!Except for the diver, every other one included witnesses and onlookers that were effectively paralyzed, and utterly no help.
Without a doubt that is a lot of it. Most humans have the capacity to learn. That was largely my point. In the case of the diver rescue, the deck was most definitely stacked in her favor. I’m uncertain on the EFR training status of one of the other divers, but the rest had at least done some EFR training, and at least one was an EFR/CPR instructor. One of those trained was a kid.How much of that is a matter of training and instruction, though?
Exactly. Kids can learn this stuff. I won’t say that I would prefer a trained kid over a trained adult, but I would definitely prefer a trained kid over an untrained adult in an emergency situation.That was when it really hit home for me just how pervasive incompetence is. Boy Scouts are kids. Kids can learn this stuff.
I agree in preferring a trained kid oven an untrained adult, but that may be a somewhat obvious choice. Best thing of course is a trained adult.Without a doubt that is a lot of it. Most humans have the capacity to learn. That was largely my point. In the case of the diver rescue, the deck was most definitely stacked in her favor. I’m uncertain on the EFR training status of one of the other divers, but the rest had at least done some EFR training, and at least one was an EFR/CPR instructor. One of those trained was a kid.
Exactly. Kids can learn this stuff. I won’t say that I would prefer a trained kid over a trained adult, but I would definitely prefer a trained kid over an untrained adult in an emergency situation.
Well, boyscouts in reality often face truly dangerous conditions.But you're not likely to get into a panic situation on the trail in Boy Scouts.
Back to my idea about brain development and abstract thinking. Parent buddy goes unconscious-- will they react?