I completely understand the frustration of divers who have been turned down by dive operators when the diver's physician has cleared the diver for diving. This is not a situation that I would like to be in.
However one has to consider that when you go diving, your decision does not neccessarily affect only yourself, especially if something goes wrong. When there is an accident, dive operators do not simply get away with 'opps, we did not know about the health problem of the diver'. They still has to take responsibility. So as much as you are making the decision to take a risk, they should also have the right to determine who they are willing to be responsible for or what risk they are willing to take. How about other divers on the trip? If a problem occurs, their trip could be terminated, they could be placed in a stressful situation when a member of the group is sick. The trip could be terminated prematurely etc etc. I think it is better to be upfront and honest about medical condition as it is always safer to be with dive operators who are comfortable with your condition and willing to take you rather than some operators who are ignorant of your problem and are not equip to handle the situation if anything should go wrong.
Why should there be a difference between training and leisure dive trip? The risk of exacerbation of the medical condition should still be the same when you are underwater. It is not more dangerous when you train then when you go on a dive trip. As much as an instructor is responsible for his or her students, the dive operators also have to be responsible for their clients.
This is just my personal bias and I am not trying to say that if you choose to do thing differently, you are wrong. Just a thought...
However one has to consider that when you go diving, your decision does not neccessarily affect only yourself, especially if something goes wrong. When there is an accident, dive operators do not simply get away with 'opps, we did not know about the health problem of the diver'. They still has to take responsibility. So as much as you are making the decision to take a risk, they should also have the right to determine who they are willing to be responsible for or what risk they are willing to take. How about other divers on the trip? If a problem occurs, their trip could be terminated, they could be placed in a stressful situation when a member of the group is sick. The trip could be terminated prematurely etc etc. I think it is better to be upfront and honest about medical condition as it is always safer to be with dive operators who are comfortable with your condition and willing to take you rather than some operators who are ignorant of your problem and are not equip to handle the situation if anything should go wrong.
Why should there be a difference between training and leisure dive trip? The risk of exacerbation of the medical condition should still be the same when you are underwater. It is not more dangerous when you train then when you go on a dive trip. As much as an instructor is responsible for his or her students, the dive operators also have to be responsible for their clients.
This is just my personal bias and I am not trying to say that if you choose to do thing differently, you are wrong. Just a thought...