I'm getting tired of this exchange, as it seems you're just trying to pick a fight. You're either misunderstanding (willfully?) what I'm writing, or you are very bombastically saying that what is commonly taught by many very well regarded instructors (not to mention whole agency standards) is patently wrong.Period. Anything else is bad advice, which you should stop offering.
I'm still not 100% sure which.
Define "no one" and "needs". I'm really trying to get ahead of every possible misunderstanding here. Yes, it is possible to dive without a BC with good weighting. It is also possible to use a BC to achieve neutral buoyancy at any depth, at any point in the dive, regardless of gas weight. So, the only thing worth discussing is: How big of a depth change (or more specifically the relative change in pressure) where it's advantageous to make an adjustment. You seem to say that it's "bad advice" to make adjustments to the BC unless you "descend significantly deeper", without specifying what a significant depth change is for you.When properly weighted, no one needs to use their BC for routine depth adjustment.
Why would the initial descent be much different than a descent at say 10 minutes into the dive? It seems you are assuming square profiles, or at least a quick descent to max bottom depth, and mostly ascending with an empty BC.You only need to add air to the BC on initial descent to keep from cratering into the sand.
As in air expansion in the BC? But only on the final ascent? And not on an ascent from 25m to 18m after 10 minutes of bottom time?And you only need to release air from the BC to compensate for the swing in tank buoyancy from gas consumption, and to compensate for wetsuit and air expansion on ascent.