BDSC
Contributor
The Tide is looking really good this year. Of course they always do. Likely another championship.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It gets old doesn't it. Behind the scenes some of us have a bet of how long it will take him to come along when BigBlue lights are mentioned and dazzle us with his math and then end up telling us how great the lights are from UWLD. Honestly, to say the 30,000 lumen is really only 5,000 is just absurd.
Likely the 30k lumen is averaging 6k-8k lumen output for that 2 hour duration it is truly on high. If you say that that is absurd, then what lumen value do you think it is putting out, why do you think that, and please prove it I'll change my number for efficiency because I have had UWLD 60v's in the water with the 30k and it is noticeably brighter for at least the first hour, so I'll give probably an 7k-8k average output for the 2 hours. It was not brighter than the 130v that I dove with though
I had UWLD lights. I even had the 5k lumen light. It is a good light but after diving with some people who had the 30k lumen Big Blue video light I sold it. There was no comparison even after 30 minutes or so. I can't really remember the exact times but I think I did one dive with a buddy who had the 30k BB light and even after an hour the BB blew away the UWLD video light.
Neither you or I can prove anything really as we don't have the test equipment to do so. We would both be making assumptions. What's really important is actual use in the water. All the proof I need is below from someone who has had actual experience in the water with both.
And thats at half power, can run 4 day dives and a night without recharging at half power.That's a lot of light Bro!