Blackcrusader
Contributor
Correct gas selection is one part of that
Correct gas is the one I can put in my lungs to keep me alive on my dives.
This was all covered in my proper training courses.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Correct gas selection is one part of that
It's sad to see some of the "old timers" who are still innumerate and unclear on the basics. Aggregate odds are rather meaningless when you can take out the risk factors. It's like with driving. The death rates look high over the whole USA. But if you don't drive drunk or sleepy or distracted, don't ride a motorcycle, buy a car with top safety ratings, and keep it properly maintained then the aggregate odds become irrelevant to your personal risk level.
You are taking what I wrote out of context. That statistics does not evaluate any gas selection, your odds of getting killed is significantly increased at the moment you chose tec diving or ccr. If you understood what is taught to you, you would know this.
View attachment 907923
My argument is that you are already driving drunk when you took up CCR diving because you increased your rate/probability of fatality.
Same as anything else in life...You can make zero mistakes driving, do all the mitigation you want, and some random ******* can come along and take you out.
You insulted the people writing the text but you did not state whether the statement is right or wrong, or why it is right or wrong.It's hilarious that you think a slide from some random bottom-of-the-barrel training agency run by has-beens and never-has-beens strengthens your point. It's pontificating clowns like that who who make tech diving dangerous in the first place because they're presuming to teach complex subjects when they aren't even clear on the basics themselves. If you want anyone here to take you seriously you'll have to come up with something more convincing.
All other things being equal, a deeper and more complex dive will of course typically be riskier. That's why the other things are generally not kept equal -- you use better and more resilient/redundant equipment, stricter protocols including those for gas choices, etc.Do you not agree technical diving, specifically ccr diving is more risky than rec diving?
Translation: We are better than the rest of you, but I refuse to explain it further. Spend the money on the Kool-Aid, like we did.We feel comfortable because we have ways of taking virtually all of the risk out, to the extent that driving to the dive site is the deadliest part. Correct gas selection is one part of that but there are other aspects that go beyond what can be explained in a forum post. This is all covered in proper training courses.
Translation: We are better than the rest of you, but I refuse to explain it further. Spend the money on the Kool-Aid, like we did.![]()
Gotta disagree (again) about your "didnt know any better". I certainly didn't know what I know now, but in 2000 I had been mixed gas diving 8 years and rebreather diving five, so I knew 'enough' to keep myself 'out of trouble'. Now I know even more, so am even more able / qualified to evaluate the risks.When people denounce deep air diving today more than 25 years ago, I don't think it's because people got more risk averse. It's rather that back then we didn't know better, had a few misconceptions about adaptation to nitrogen narcosis. But we know more about it today, and we have more accident reports and are more aware of statistical effects (people are really bad at dealing with small but severe risks, survivorship bias, embarassing near misses are underreported, ...).