Another thing to consider when you sign up for a course is who does the instructor think they are working for? Themselves, a shop, resort, or the one who they should feel they are employed by - YOU, the new diver/student. I do not teach for or through a shop. As a result all of the money - minus expenses is my compensation that is paid by you.
You are my employer and therefore are the one in charge. I have a learning agreement that spells out my responsibility to you as well as what is expected of you during the training process. For this to work I also at any time will show the standards I am supposed to be teaching to. As well as those of the 8 other agencies I have in my library so you can compare the content of the courses. I only teach private or semi-private classes of no more than four students for OW. Usually it's one or two.
Keeping the classes small allows me great flexibility in scheduling, adding classroom and pool sessions, and doing so at no extra cost. Normally my pool sessions are on a set day. Right now it's Thursday evening but I can add sessions as long as I give the owner a weeks notice or so. Access to the pool when there are no other classes going on is unlimited for me so it's not a big deal to add when it is needed.
The one who normally decides if the added sessions are needed is the student. This is either by them saying so or my observation that they need a bit more attention and time. Perhaps shown a different way to accomplish a task. Since 2008 I've gained a reputation for being good with those who seem to need extra attention. Patience, time, and understanding help a great deal. Teaching for agencies that give me the freedom to teach as I see fit, introducing skills when I feel it's time, and in the order I choose to suit the student goes a long way to accomplishing that.
On top of that and as much as I feel that in their current form the RSTC is a toothless raggedy old washed up lion, I do teach to their standard for OW divers that says
"Open water certification qualifies a certified diver to procure air, equipment, and other services and engage in recreational open water diving without supervision. It is the intent of this standard that certified open water divers shall have received training in the fundamentals of recreational diving from an instructor. A certified open water diver is qualified to apply the knowledge and skills outlined in this standard to plan, conduct, and log open-water, no-required decompression dives when properly equipped, and accompanied by another certified diver"
In addition to that I also apply what is known as the "loved one" principle. The principle states, essentially, that once I have handed someone in open water certification card, I would be willing to allow them to take one of my loved ones on an open water dive and be confident that should a problem arise they would be able to handle it. I would also be willing to allow them to do this without any other supervision from myself or another dive professional. If I'm not comfortable with this I have no business giving them a certification card.
I truly wonder how many quickie course instructors would allow their newly certified OW student to take one of the instructor's kids the next weekend diving in the same conditions that they did the checkout dives with that student? The instructor takes a group of OW students out for checkouts in water with say 10 feet of vis, 55 degrees requiring a 7 mm FJ, a little surge and current, and does 4 20 minute dives to 20 feet over two days. I want that instructor to say to that student when they hand them their card "Hey, my 13 yr old daughter or son wants to go diving next weekend here and do two 45 minute dives to 40-50 feet to complete a school project. I have to teach a class. How about you bring them out to do that?"
If the student has been properly trained there should be no problem with them doing that. If not why would you, as a student, be satisfied with the level of training they expect you to use and maybe go out and dive with your own kids? Something to think about. Quick classes are done to minimize time and keep costs down. For the shop or instructor. Should this really be a primary consideration when what you are going to do with this card is:
1. Enter an alien environment that is normally hostile to human life? We don't have gills and can't breathe water.
2. Do so using mechanical means that requires some level of specialized training?
3. Do so unsupervised. That DM on the dive boat who may get in the water IS NOT there to keep you safe.?That's your job.
4. Do so in conditions that in many areas can change in minutes from benign to challenging to outright dangerous?
5. Do this with the understanding that someone may require your assistance in a life threatening situation that can arise suddenly?
6. Do this knowing that while SCUBA is relaxing, educational, fun, exciting, and if respected can be safe. But go too far, too fast, outside the limits of your training and experience, it can hurt or kill you very quickly, in some very nasty ways?
Keeping this in mind, why would anyone feel an abbreviated course is an acceptable path to entering this environment?
You are my employer and therefore are the one in charge. I have a learning agreement that spells out my responsibility to you as well as what is expected of you during the training process. For this to work I also at any time will show the standards I am supposed to be teaching to. As well as those of the 8 other agencies I have in my library so you can compare the content of the courses. I only teach private or semi-private classes of no more than four students for OW. Usually it's one or two.
Keeping the classes small allows me great flexibility in scheduling, adding classroom and pool sessions, and doing so at no extra cost. Normally my pool sessions are on a set day. Right now it's Thursday evening but I can add sessions as long as I give the owner a weeks notice or so. Access to the pool when there are no other classes going on is unlimited for me so it's not a big deal to add when it is needed.
The one who normally decides if the added sessions are needed is the student. This is either by them saying so or my observation that they need a bit more attention and time. Perhaps shown a different way to accomplish a task. Since 2008 I've gained a reputation for being good with those who seem to need extra attention. Patience, time, and understanding help a great deal. Teaching for agencies that give me the freedom to teach as I see fit, introducing skills when I feel it's time, and in the order I choose to suit the student goes a long way to accomplishing that.
On top of that and as much as I feel that in their current form the RSTC is a toothless raggedy old washed up lion, I do teach to their standard for OW divers that says
"Open water certification qualifies a certified diver to procure air, equipment, and other services and engage in recreational open water diving without supervision. It is the intent of this standard that certified open water divers shall have received training in the fundamentals of recreational diving from an instructor. A certified open water diver is qualified to apply the knowledge and skills outlined in this standard to plan, conduct, and log open-water, no-required decompression dives when properly equipped, and accompanied by another certified diver"
In addition to that I also apply what is known as the "loved one" principle. The principle states, essentially, that once I have handed someone in open water certification card, I would be willing to allow them to take one of my loved ones on an open water dive and be confident that should a problem arise they would be able to handle it. I would also be willing to allow them to do this without any other supervision from myself or another dive professional. If I'm not comfortable with this I have no business giving them a certification card.
I truly wonder how many quickie course instructors would allow their newly certified OW student to take one of the instructor's kids the next weekend diving in the same conditions that they did the checkout dives with that student? The instructor takes a group of OW students out for checkouts in water with say 10 feet of vis, 55 degrees requiring a 7 mm FJ, a little surge and current, and does 4 20 minute dives to 20 feet over two days. I want that instructor to say to that student when they hand them their card "Hey, my 13 yr old daughter or son wants to go diving next weekend here and do two 45 minute dives to 40-50 feet to complete a school project. I have to teach a class. How about you bring them out to do that?"
If the student has been properly trained there should be no problem with them doing that. If not why would you, as a student, be satisfied with the level of training they expect you to use and maybe go out and dive with your own kids? Something to think about. Quick classes are done to minimize time and keep costs down. For the shop or instructor. Should this really be a primary consideration when what you are going to do with this card is:
1. Enter an alien environment that is normally hostile to human life? We don't have gills and can't breathe water.
2. Do so using mechanical means that requires some level of specialized training?
3. Do so unsupervised. That DM on the dive boat who may get in the water IS NOT there to keep you safe.?That's your job.
4. Do so in conditions that in many areas can change in minutes from benign to challenging to outright dangerous?
5. Do this with the understanding that someone may require your assistance in a life threatening situation that can arise suddenly?
6. Do this knowing that while SCUBA is relaxing, educational, fun, exciting, and if respected can be safe. But go too far, too fast, outside the limits of your training and experience, it can hurt or kill you very quickly, in some very nasty ways?
Keeping this in mind, why would anyone feel an abbreviated course is an acceptable path to entering this environment?