Don’t undersell yourself Ray. Maybe it should be WWRS. What would Ray Say.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Cameron's new scooter was a Silent Submersion uv18
Almost none of that applies here. He was a certified instructor for two different agencies, had his scooter with him for less air consumption, was full cave certified - not that it applied but it shows the discipline. Also didn't someone say he was diving sidemount doubles?Here is a statement from PADI in that regard ““(130 feet) is an appropriate limit for single-cylinder no-stop diving with air because of the short no-stop time you have, plus the relatively quick consumption of your gas supply,” says Karl Shreeves, PADI’s technical development executive. “It is also the depth by which almost all divers begin to find gas narcosis noticeable “ So ripping currents, solo, 130 ft plus. Bad combo.
And yet the result is here and here we are having this discussion. Solo technical dive with a ripping current. Unusual DPV mount, going below recommended recreational depths solo is dangerous even if you are a multi-agency instructor. If you go back to the original thread the dive plan decribed shore diving in a 6 knot current, leaving the dive partner at 70 few to descend to 120-150 fsw for 5-10 minutes. That dive plan at its maximums would have a decompression obligation whether you have a scooter, cave certified, or multiagency instructor or not. You can look at the dive charts and see. One poster from Coz said the current was ripping at 6 knots that day. Plus the risk of nitrogen narcosis as pointed out by PADI’s technical director. Its seems that frequently in the A&I section we read a lot about technical dives. On your own, you are free to do what you want and can rationalize/normalize what you like. It’s your life, do what you will. But clearly in looking at this incident you can see that multiple guidelines and recommendations were exceeded particularly with the conditions.Almost none of that applies here. He was a certified instructor for two different agencies, had his scooter with him for less air consumption, was full cave certified - not that it applied but it shows the discipline. Also didn't someone say he was diving sidemount doubles?