about GF on deco software

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

hakura

Registered
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello tek friends
I have questions on GF of the deco software.
In most of case, the GF has been set from 30% to 85%. My first question is why from 30% to 85%. And, the second question is, 'Can we dive with the GF from 100% to 100%?
 
hakura:
Hello tek friends
I have questions on GF of the deco software.
In most of case, the GF has been set from 30% to 85%. My first question is why from 30% to 85%. And, the second question is, 'Can we dive with the GF from 100% to 100%?
30% gives a rasonable first depth for a stop.. personally I use either 10 or 20 depending on what I allow my HF high to be set at..

running100/100 (so,e software you would have to do 99/100 or 95/100) is the same as running a pure puhlman with 0% conservatism.. most (not all) non gf deco programs that have a 0% setting actually still have some built in conservatism (depending on how its implemented usually falls in the range of about 90-95 setting on a gf based deco program)

If you aren;t sure what the settings do you shouldn't be using the software.. If you were trained using a gf based deco program your instructor should have explained the effects of the various settings
.
 
hakura:
. . . the second question is, 'Can we dive with the GF from 100% to 100%?
It depends on the exposure. The more extreme the exposure, the less conservative the 2nd (surfacing) gradient needs to be. On mild exposures, bubble models and Buhlmann/Haldanian models will require roughly the same amount of decompression assuming the deep stops are done in the Buhlmann/Haldanian model. But bubble models can also require a little longer decompresson on the very mild exposures. So, on mild exposures, the 2nd GF should be more conservative if you desire a conservative profile. But as the exposure gets more extreme, bubble models will require less decompression than the Buhlmann/Haldania models. So setting the 2nd GF at the least conservative setting will still be more conservative than the bubble model calculations.
 
My first question is why from 30% to 85%.

Because these are fairly conservative numbers that are unlikely to get a diver trained in decompression procedures hurt.

Can we dive with the GF from 100% to 100%?

If you're a grownup, you can do most anything you want. The better question would be, "Can I survive a dive with the gradient factor set to X/X?" Like padiscubapro said, if you don't know what this stuff is, talk to your instructor about getting your money back. You did take the class, right? :eyebrow:
 
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom