A DIR spin on an old question

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Let the thread die. Start a new one. Problem solved. Lamont can do other things.

;)
Tom
 
If you follow some simple rules, your chances of needing that redundant gas is virtually zero. Whereas a good team mate will play a critical role in every dive to proactively avoid problems or address minor issues before they escalate into big problems. (They haven't invented a pony bottle that does that, have they?)

If you know what the heck you are doing, your chance of needing a buddy to help you navigate is virtually zero. Also a buddy should not be needed on EVERY dive to avoid problems. A good diver (solo or otherwise) should be able to avoid problems before they escalate.... :shakehead::shakehead:

If redundant gas is so unimportant, then why have a manifold isolation valve which adds "unnecessary" complexity and potential failure points to double tanks?
 
If redundant gas is so unimportant, then why have a manifold isolation valve which adds "unnecessary" complexity and potential failure points to double tanks?

Redundant gas is very important. That's why my buddy brings along a bunch of extra gas for me. Of course, I return the favor in case he needs any.

Terry
 
If redundant gas is so unimportant, then why have a manifold isolation valve which adds "unnecessary" complexity and potential failure points to double tanks?

It's my understanding the isolator valve solves more problems then it causes
 
:trainwreck:

:flush:
 

Back
Top Bottom