Safety Stop
Contributor
Dont know if it's worth it to buy a 35mm lens for my DSLR for underwater photo?
Envoyé de mon SM-T310 en utilisant Tapatalk
Envoyé de mon SM-T310 en utilisant Tapatalk
35mm underwater
- Thread starter Safety Stop
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
I would not bother with a 35mm lens..get something wider..35mm only good for a head/shoulder shot or a mediocre fish portrait. Uw a 35 shoots like a 50mm above water.
OP
Safety Stop
Contributor
I already have a 60mm and 105 macro, and Tokina 10-17 WA. Dont know what could be the advantage of a 35mm.
Envoyé de mon SM-T310 en utilisant Tapatalk
Envoyé de mon SM-T310 en utilisant Tapatalk
FyshEye
Contributor
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 43
- # of dives
- 2500 - 4999
I have the same three lenses for my U/W Kit. That seems to be all I have ever needed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have a 35mm F1.8 that I use occasionally. It works behind either a flat port or a small dome. Good for fish portraits, schools and subjects that would be a bit too large for the 60mm. I'd use it on a low vis dive where I might expect seals, molas or other larger subjects but not looking for cfwa or the big picture. Don't take it out too often, but it's a cheap alternative and useful as a topside walking around lens as well.
Exactly what everyone else said. Not the most interesting focal length. I prefer wide or macro. Good luck! - Scott Gietler
Similar threads
