There have been some ungodly complicated balanced reg designs over time (features to remove pressure form the seat when the air is off, etc) and there are still a few of them around today - but the S600/S555/G500/G250V/G250HP/G250/G200B are not among them.
In the case of the G200B and S555 the only difference betwene that design and an unbalanced G200 is a poppet with a hole through the middle, a lighter spring and a fixed balance chamber. The poppet has 2 o-rings and only needs 1 so there is 100% redundancy. The spring pressures are actually lighter than in the their unbalanced counterparts (R109, G200, etc) so seat wear is actually reduced.
The G250 and G250V add an adjustment knob with 1 o-ring that only has to resist a maximum of perhaps 20" of water pressure if you inhale really really hard.
The knob on the S600 and G250HP is slightly more complex, but the case o-rings has a redundnat back up and the internal o-ring inside the knob is static and not prone to wear. I have never seen one fail.
Oddly enough I did see a recent failure of an R109 Adjustable (an unbalanced design) where the pad for the spring fractured and jammed the spring in the air barrel causing it to fail to deliver gas. That failure could not have occurred in the Balanced R156 version of that reg.
Unlike the G200, most unbalanced regs are dual adjustment models (separate adjustments for both orifice and lever height). In comparision to an unbalanced dual adjustment reg like the R190/R290/R295/R380/R390 all of the above singel adjustment (one adjustment for both orifice and lever height) models are at least as reliable. There are things that can go wrong in an unbalanced dual adjustment reg that can cause leaks or failure to deliver air that cannot happen in the balanced or unbalanced single adjustment design such as the retaining nut for the lever coming off, the washer fracturing, etc. so one is not really any more failure prone than the other.
In short, you may feel like you are safer with an unbalanced second, but you really are not, you'll just be breathing harder and have a reg with less flow and less working range every time you use it.
In the case of the G200B and S555 the only difference betwene that design and an unbalanced G200 is a poppet with a hole through the middle, a lighter spring and a fixed balance chamber. The poppet has 2 o-rings and only needs 1 so there is 100% redundancy. The spring pressures are actually lighter than in the their unbalanced counterparts (R109, G200, etc) so seat wear is actually reduced.
The G250 and G250V add an adjustment knob with 1 o-ring that only has to resist a maximum of perhaps 20" of water pressure if you inhale really really hard.
The knob on the S600 and G250HP is slightly more complex, but the case o-rings has a redundnat back up and the internal o-ring inside the knob is static and not prone to wear. I have never seen one fail.
Oddly enough I did see a recent failure of an R109 Adjustable (an unbalanced design) where the pad for the spring fractured and jammed the spring in the air barrel causing it to fail to deliver gas. That failure could not have occurred in the Balanced R156 version of that reg.
Unlike the G200, most unbalanced regs are dual adjustment models (separate adjustments for both orifice and lever height). In comparision to an unbalanced dual adjustment reg like the R190/R290/R295/R380/R390 all of the above singel adjustment (one adjustment for both orifice and lever height) models are at least as reliable. There are things that can go wrong in an unbalanced dual adjustment reg that can cause leaks or failure to deliver air that cannot happen in the balanced or unbalanced single adjustment design such as the retaining nut for the lever coming off, the washer fracturing, etc. so one is not really any more failure prone than the other.
In short, you may feel like you are safer with an unbalanced second, but you really are not, you'll just be breathing harder and have a reg with less flow and less working range every time you use it.