PPo2 1.4 is for CNS so that all fine and dandy,The issue is the PPn2 of 5.2 N2. If you are OK diving to that partial pressure that is fine.I have a few buddies that have done it, but also later said that it was not a pleasant experience and would probably not go there again. If you are used to it and can handle emergency situation with that kind of narcosis it is your call.
yeah, but what OP said was the 70' stop wasn't required. maybe u could stick to what OP said rather than guessing from ur assumption on OP's training??
Actually what he said was:
3) I switched to 50% O2 @ 70fsw even though I didn’t need to as I wasn’t sure I could use the O2 hang reg because of the current. I was able to use it so I had quite a bit safety margin.
Hence my assumption that dive had no plan. He brings 50% but intends to use the o2 hange maybe if he can reach it?? On the ascent kind of realises "hey maybe i might not reach the 100%, after reaching 70 and the narcosis is better ''?? yes no which is it. Doesn't sound like a plan to me. You carry on your person what you need to complete deco according to a planned worst case **** hitting the fan scenario, the hang o2 is for emergency.
According to V-Planner at conserve @ 2, 185 for a bottom time 3 to 4 minutes, with lost 50% gas and no 100%, entails deco to start at 40', 2 mins at 30, 2 mins at 20 and 4 mins at 10'. did he plan for that??
do u know if OP had enough 50% & air in gas plan to deco out w/o the O2 he hung at 20'? if u don't know for sure, kinda makes u sound clueless, no?
How much air or deco gas you have is irrelevant if you don't perform you decompression properly. No?? Deco theory is a crap shoot so hence there is reason to put every thing on your side.
Therefore, if he got bent as did his friend on the same dive one year apart diving the same profile that got his friend bent, maybe they are doing something wrong or are under estimating the conservatism they need to factor in the plan there body needs to stay safe
ur really eager 2 make this into a situation u have in ur mind, but not what the OP said: dives were cut shorter than planned bc anchor was dragging & they elected 2 abort in each case.
If dives where cut short?? Bail out plan maybe?? and Follow it??
I don't know the level of training he has, doesn't say, so i have to go with my gut and experience that proper risk management planning was not part of training.
i guess DIR mean make up facts and then comment on them
I'M not a DIR disciple by any means, and was trained to do what works for each dive circumstance, by incorporating from all forms of training out there.Before any deep dive all the team goes over need gear and/or configuration and all possible contingencies that can arise.A well planned dive whether aborted or completed has effect of making any **** hitting the fan scenario become more of an inconvenience that an emergency,whether below or above water.
From what Mobile Diver wrote from original post didn't give me the impressions of a planned dive, sorry.
I could be wrong and there could of been other info on dive not mentioned because Mobile diver was tired and wanted to go to bed so short cut his post,and if so I Apologize for Assuming.
Dive safe and good luck