LeadTurn_SD
Contributor
I must be missing something... I'd just use the number of cu ft (less the margin for reg pressure) rather than converting it to PSI in an Al 80 tank. I can understand the logic and why someone might be interested in converting it to an equivalent PSI in an Al 80 but I think that's just making it more complex than the question needs to be.
Yep.
I think the direction several folks are trying to gently move the discussion in is to volumes. Once a diver grasps the relationship between the SPG reading, the volume remaining in the tank, and the effect of depth on rate of consumption of that remaining volume, suddenly a light goes on and the SPG is now seen as a timepiece rather than a pressure gauge:
"At this depth, with this volume tank, working this hard, my spg is really telling me that I can only stay 'X' minutes before I need to start heading up towards sunlight and seagulls".
It took me a bit of diving to make that connection.
Most folks are smarter than I am and grasp the connection more quickly .
Best wishes.