NJCDC LEGISLATIVE ALERT

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

njdiver1

Contributor
Messages
478
Reaction score
61
Location
jersey shore
TAKING LOBSTER FOR THE SUMMER OF 2018 IN JEOPARDY

Due to warming inshore waters and predation in Lower Cape Cod, RI, and CT, the American Lobster landings in the Commercial fishery have declined drastically in what is referred to as the Southern New England (SNE) stock that also includes NY, NJ and further south to Cape Hatteras. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission is trying to increase egg production by proposing seasonal closures and restrictions to gauge sizes and possible trap reductions with the Draft Addendum XXV available at http://www.asmfc.org/…/58a35d02AmLobsterDraftAddendumXXV_Pu…. Last year I personally observed more lobsters in 60 plus ft. of water out of Barnegat Inlet then I have in many years, and dive shops and captains I talked to did not report any shortage of lobsters. With this Alert, the NJCDC is making some recommendations, but use your digression.

Unfortunately, the Addendum mentions the summer months, such as July through September as the most beneficial time for a seasonal closure (p. 18). This could virtually shut down the sport diver fishery for lobster during our high season, and adversely affect dive shops, dive boats, and sport diving in 2018. The Addendum suggests in Issue 3 (Recreational Fishery), the possibility of separating the recreational lobster fishery from the commercial fishery and/or applying gauge changes only to the Recreational Fishery. Sport divers should consider supporting Option C (recreational fishery subject to gauge changes, but not closed seasons). Safety in sport diving is very dependent on the weather which tends to be calmer in the summer. It may take a significantly large number of letters to convince the American Lobster Board to accept this option.
Issue 1 asks the question, how much should egg production be increased with target options from 0 (status quo), 20, 30, 40, and 60 percent. A 60 percent target is likely to close the fishery for both Commercial and Recreational and would be unrealistic. It is unlikely that the American Lobster Board will accept 0 (status quo). A realistic target such as 20% might be best for sustaining the fishery. Issue 2 involves management options and asks whether management tools can be used independently or must be used in combination with one another. The NJCDC is uncertain of its impact, but perhaps the flexibility of Option A would be best. Issue 5 involves uniform regulations across the Lobster Conservation Management Areas in the SNE stock. Option B would require regulations to be uniform over Area 4 and 5. Area 4 and 5 splits a few miles north of Barnegat Inlet on a line that runs East to West and areas North and South of that line presently have different closure dates, creating confusion in the recreational fishery and enforcement problems for NJ Conservation Officers. Option B should get rid of that problem! Most of the other issues 4, 6 and 7 pertain specifically to the Commercial pot fishery or States south.

There will be public hearings on March 15th at Belmar Municipal Court, 601 Main St, Belmar, NJ. At 6 PM. For New York divers, the hearing will be on March 20th at 6 pm at the NYSDEC Div. of Marine Resources, 205 N. Belle Mead Rd, East Setauket NY.

Written comments should be addressed to Megan Ware, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1050 N Highlands St, Suite 200 A-N, Arlington, VA 22201. Or by E mail to mware@asmfc.org. Comments must arrive by April 7th, and designate all comments with “Lobster Addendum XXV”.

In conclusion, sport divers should consider supporting Issue 1, Option B, Issue 3, Option C, and Issue 5, Option B. Most importantly and make it loud and clear – NO 3 MONTH SUMMER CLOSURE!

Jack Fullmer
NJCDC Legislative Committee
jf2983182@msn.com
 
Just a few years ago the lobster population in the Long Island sound was killed by what scientists believe to have been pesticides. Slowly they have been returning to our coast. I think something has to be done to protect them and allow them to grow! If it means restrictions during their egg production than be it!

 
Are you aware that these closures are from roughly Cape Cod to Cape Hatteras?
 
Last edited:
OP, sorry to see that you are dismissing recommendations of the Fisheries Commission, in favor of your personal opinion and your hobby. Rather self-centered.
 
Sorry, I can't join your fight on this one. If a temporary restriction is what it takes to prevent the extinction of a species then so be it. It is unfortunate that lobster reproduce during prime diving season but the dive industry will survive. I want the lobster to survive too.
 
From the South Shore of Long Island to Cape Hatteras we are not experiencing the same severity of this issue as Long Island Sound.
 
Present closures are:

Local Management Area (LMA) 4, roughly south of Long Island to just north of Barnegat Inlet:

April 30 to May 31


LMA 5, just above Barnegat Inlet to roughly Cape Hatteras:

February 1 to March 31
 
I agree with others here. Fisheries closures are often necessary. Growing up on the gulf coast, I watched some severe restrictions and closures allow redfish and red snapper populations to rebound. I love seafood, but I'll gladly give up some for a time if that means they'll be around for future generations. We've already decimated our ocean fisheries as a whole, they need all the help they can get.
 
"Over the last decade, recreational landings in Connecticut have varied between 1% and 4% of annual total harvest. In New York, 2015 recreational harvest was 2,130 pounds, or roughly 1.4% of total state harvest. Recreational harvest in Massachusetts is significantly higher, in pounds, than the other states in SNE with a five year average from 2010‐2014 of 224,932 pounds; however, it is important to note that this includes landings from both the GOM/GBK and SNE stocks. Similar to New York, Massachusetts’ recreational fishery represents roughly 1% of total state landings."

http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/58a35d02AmLobsterDraftAddendumXXV_PublicComment.pdf
 

Back
Top Bottom