Risk of Diving vs Driving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

There are some safety improvements made to automobile to prevent personal injury during collisions since 40 years ago, such as airbag, impact absorbing bumpers, etc. Since we are discussing risk of diving vs driving, my question is what safety improvements made to dive gears to prevent divers from say drowning due to equipment related failure since 40 years ago?

I have only been diving for 14 years, so those of you who have been diving longer than me or dive instructors may know & would like to share some of the diving safety advancement made since, say 1980 here.

Thanks!
Big improvements in diving since 1980? there have been a few. Weirdly, some of things have not changed much. A good quality regulator from 1980 is probably on par with regulators today. There have been some big changes, Dive Computers integrate a host of functions that used to be held in a bunch of separate devices, depth gauge, watch/bottom timer, dive tables, all wrapped into a single highly reliable device. SPGs were pretty standard, but my first tank still came with a J-valve. The second stage octopus was not universal in 1980, nor was the LP inflator Jacket BCDs were just coming out and they were a huge improvement over Horse collars BCs. The idea of adding and losing air to maintain perfect trim was not really thought out very well (I recall almost no training in my basic course or my Assistant Instructor course about buoyancy control). Wetsuits have gotten a lot nicer, as have dry suits. Fins have improved a lot (most of the good fins in 1980 are still available today, and have many fans) but newer varieties have. LED Lights have gotten cheaper and more reliable.

The big changes have been more philosophical. With buoyancy control comes the safety stop and don't touch the bottom/reef. Computers are more trustable than the tables. The dive specialties have become much more elaborate. Cave diving existed, but CCR didn't and mixed gas diving didn't exist outside the military. Lots of changes.
 
The nature of the risks differs in some ways. If I dive carelessly, the death I cause will likely only be my own. There may be large amounts of money and manpower expended in a search for the body if not quickly recovered, so there are costs to others, but the death will be mine. I'm speaking of recreational diving; death during extended cave exploration where those doing body recovery take on great risk would be another story.

If I drive carelessly, my odds of seriously injuring or killing other people seem much higher than diving. I could slam into a vehicle and take out 3 or 4 people. Not only is this a danger to them, it's a danger to me...I don't want that much blood on my hands. If I survived, I imagine much of the rest of my life would be a horror lived in the shadow of what I'd done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dan
Since we drive much more than we dive, we normalize risk differently while driving in a way we wouldn't in diving. Driving with a dead headlight, in snow, rain or fog, while tired. if we only were driving once every few days, we would probably not be willing to take risks with a vehicle that cost thousands of dollars and, for many, are essential to maintaining our income.

Frequent divers, like Northernone probably normalize risk more than they should. They get used to getting in little jams and escaping them with little panic or difficulty and then hit a series of little jams and find them much more challenging. If they get out of them they are chastened and change their tolerance for risk. I stopped driving back from 3 dive trips alone because I realized how close I was to falling asleep at the wheel and could not find a satisfactory way to minimize the risk.
 
Since we drive much more than we dive, we normalize risk differently while driving in a way we wouldn't in diving. Driving with a dead headlight, in snow, rain or fog, while tired. if we only were driving once every few days, we would probably not be willing to take risks with a vehicle that cost thousands of dollars and, for many, are essential to maintaining our income.

Frequent divers, like Northernone probably normalize risk more than they should. They get used to getting in little jams and escaping them with little panic or difficulty and then hit a series of little jams and find them much more challenging. If they get out of them they are chastened and change their tolerance for risk. I stopped driving back from 3 dive trips alone because I realized how close I was to falling asleep at the wheel and could not find a satisfactory way to minimize the risk.

This, a lot! We normalize things that are scary when it becomes routine. It's honestly the only way you can cope with dealing with long-term scary things, otherwise you'd go a little insane with anxiety. It's hard because you need to retain some of the fear to keep focus, but not too much of it, to cause inaction.
 
I have only been diving for 14 years, so those of you who have been diving longer than me or dive instructors may know & would like to share some of the diving safety advancement made since, say 1980 here.

Orca Edge dive computer 1983. The first accurate reliable dive computer, a buddy of mine still uses his.

Most improvements have been minor, as in no new technology. A rough list of "modern" improvements:

SPG - 1958 - prevalent in the 70's
Regulator - 1958 Sherwood mfg. adapted piston regulator for underwater use.
IP air inflation for BC - before 1970 for new BC's
Jacket BC - ScubaPro Stabilizer jacket 1972
Back inflate - Watergill Atpac 1972. BP/W 1979
Alternate second stage - ? Seen in the '70's, prevalent in the '80's. Procedure rather than new.


Not to say there are not improvements being made, however we are still diving esentially the same gear as in the '80's, or earlier.



Bob
 
This is exactly the sales pitch that sells SUV's... and then we end up with more of them. (Not blaming you for owning one, just explaining how we got here.)

OK, so today I replaced my totaled 2015 Highlander with a new 2019 Highlander. :) Now just need a good deal on roof rack mounted Sidewinder missiles!
 

Back
Top Bottom