OWD license without a doctor's certificate?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

many people currently lie because whether they have seen a doctor or not, they are afraid of being blocked from diving,
You keep saying this....what makes you think it is a common problem?
like those here who might see checked boxes and decide they don't care what doctors have said.
Who said that? If the box is checked, the doctor's signature is all that is needed.
My own displeasure at not being trusted that I've seen a doctor is additional.
THIS is the real problem. Your competency and honestly are being questioned. You bet...that is the system.
Finally, if safety were really the concern, not liability, everyone should need an annual physical and doctor's note to dive.
You are missing the concept of relative risk mitigation and trying to make everything black and white. But, you've made up your mind and so the subject is no longer discussable. You are right, and everybody else is wrong. It will be interesting to see how far that gets you.
 
Sorry I wasted my time. I really don't care what you do.

Well you just might, when you get back to diving.

To steal a line from George Carlin: ""Somewhere out there is the world's worst doctor. The scariest part is that someone has an appointment with him tomorrow."

"Somewhere out there is a diver with an undisclosed syncope that could render him or her unconscious. The scariest part is that someone is going to be their dive buddy".
 
Well you just might, when you get back to diving.

To steal a line from George Carlin: ""Somewhere out there is the world's worst doctor. The scariest part is that someone has an appointment with him tomorrow."

"Somewhere out there is a diver with an undisclosed syncope that could render him or her unconscious. The scariest part is that someone is going to be their dive buddy".


Hah!

Wait a minute? Am I the world's worst doctor (debatable)..? Or am I her dive buddy in this scenario?
 
Most of my acquaintances that dive are occasional vacation divers that were certified in their late twenties, but like me, are around our fifties. All of them were surprised that I had my physician fill out the PADI form when I had my annual physical, as none of them had ever done this, even though I know they are on cholesterol medication, have hay fever, get seasick, have had hernias repaired, back pain, smoke pot, either singly or in any of the possible combinations.
These are all things the PADI form lists as requiring a physician exam, but only for a student - instructor scenario. It’s clearly designed primarily as a liability waiver as it’s not required at all “just” to dive, even though human physiology doesn’t care whether you are in a class or not.
 
You keep saying this....what makes you think it is a common problem?

1.Who said that? If the box is checked, the doctor's signature is all that is needed.

2.THIS is the real problem. Your competency and honestly are being questioned. You bet...that is the system.

3.You are missing the concept of relative risk mitigation and trying to make everything black and white. But, you've made up your mind and so the subject is no longer discussable. You are right, and everybody else is wrong. It will be interesting to see how far that gets you.
(numbers added by me so I could address them easier)

1. If you had read several of the links I posted, it was discussing how this is a common issue for many and the reason they don't disclose is because of being afraid of being not allowed to dive, not necessarily because they shouldn't be allowed, but they don't want to run the risk.

2. It's not my competency, nor my honesty. I'm not evaluating myself (in my case), so competency doesn't enter into it. Honesty doesn't really either, because there is no checking to see if I am being honest about anything - it's just a liability form. I just view it as a pointless system since there are no controls to ensure honesty, and so it is theater only, not actually making people safer. Obviously many people here are fine with that, but I'm discussing other options that could potentially make a real impact for safety, not just a liability form.

3. You've missed what I've been saying. It's not that I'm the only one that is right - everyone is a little right. I keep discussing it because either I've not been able to explain what I'm talking about well enough or people aren't understanding the actual point of what I'm trying to communicate, so I vainly hope that by phrasing it a different way, maybe people can see the point I'm trying to make - which isn't saying that most people are "wrong" per se, it's that the perception vs reality for the form is not identical and the form itself doesn't do anything except release liability. Those who want to hide conditions will hide conditions. Those who don't want to get conditions worked up, will still not get them worked up. Those who did get them worked up, they got them worked up whether the form exists or not, whether it is a physician signature or not. Physicians have to sign the forms for children to participate in sports, not adults, even when it is recommended to see a physician prior to starting a sport.

I don't view this as a black and white issue, it's very shaded; it's others view it as very black and white: The form is the only way to go, it is the only right answer, there is no better answer, we can't try and think of other solutions, sit down, shut up. (at least, that is how it is being perceived by me)

Obviously some people truly love the form and think that form will keep everyone safe. I understand the reason they made the form, which is a liability release, and I think that is very proper, because I think the dive shops/instructors should be released from liability outside of gross misconduct (ie you're in the water, your instructor comes up behind you and turns off your tank - that person should be liable for that LOL). I think the responsibility and liability for their own safety should be with the diver, because unless you are going to require physicals for everyone, have a medical release so the doctor's information can be confirmed, and have some sort of structured way of dealing with protected health information, you can achieve the same result (or possibly better) with other ways of doing it, ways that don't encourage people to lie, which has been shown to be an issue. (see previous link and even other posters)

Mostly, I think there's value in discussion about the topic, which hopefully is more than some people just refusing to consider anything other than the status quo. I don't expect this conversation will alter current practices, but maybe if people talked about it more, it could eventually and create a situation that increases safety.

As I said previously, I have gotten a new idea out of this conversation myself, to have the signed form with no checkboxes - even though it's pointless in my mind. Whether someone fills it out accurately or not, it still releases the shop from liability, which I whole-heartedly agree with.
 
Well you just might, when you get back to diving.

To steal a line from George Carlin: ""Somewhere out there is the world's worst doctor. The scariest part is that someone has an appointment with him tomorrow."

"Somewhere out there is a diver with an undisclosed syncope that could render him or her unconscious. The scariest part is that someone is going to be their dive buddy".

Again, if you are referring to me - whether I disclose my history with syncope (or liver failure, or on an antidepressant or any other medical misadventures I've had in my life) or not doesn't affect the fact that it has been cleared as safe. I disclose as a courtesy to people so they know a) that I am ready and willing to call the dive for myself if I have any symptoms (similar to a mild asthmatic who should not dive while having an asthma attack, or a diabetic who shouldn't dive while they are in DKA) and that if I have an issue and stay on the boat, to not worry, I do not need to return to land if it happens, it is not an emergency.

What I would hate to have happen is: I get on a boat to dive and start to feel ill. I decide not to dive because of feeling ill, and while I'm waiting for everyone to come back onto the boat, I lay down to prevent syncope and then people freak out and force all the divers out of the water to return me to land - that isn't necessary. I'm not in any danger, everyone else can keep diving, I just lose my chance to dive.
 
As I said previously, I have gotten a new idea out of this conversation myself, to have the signed form with no checkboxes - even though it's pointless in my mind. Whether someone fills it out accurately or not, it still releases the shop from liability, which I whole-heartedly agree with.
Sigh.
This is what I said back in post #59, all I need as an instructor is the signed page 2. I don't care about the checked boxes or not.
 
Sigh.
This is what I said back in post #59, all I need as an instructor is the signed page 2. I don't care about the checked boxes or not.
The PADI form includes the following verbiage:
“You must complete this Medical Statement, which includes the medical questionnaire section, to enroll in the scuba training program.”

Perhaps you are not a PADI instructor. While broadly similar, not every agency handles the details the exact same way. Which often muddies the waters in these conversations that assume blanket answers to questions about standards and requirements.
 
The PADI form includes the following verbiage:
“You must complete this Medical Statement, which includes the medical questionnaire section, to enroll in the scuba training program.”

Perhaps you are not a PADI instructor. While broadly similar, not every agency handles the details the exact same way. Which often muddies the waters in these conversations that assume blanket answers to questions about standards and requirements.
Yes, I'm a long time PADI instructor, and have had multiple discussions with PADI on that form. The boxes need not be checked, but if they are not then the doctor's signature on page 2 is mandatory. Check it out with PADI yourself.
Note the statement just above the student's signature:
"I agree to accept responsibility for omissions regarding my failure to disclose any existing or past health condition, or any changes thereto."
Why would this statement even be there if no omissions were allowed?
 

Back
Top Bottom