O2 + CO analyzer choices.

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

cootwo project on Kickstarter has been fully funded in less than a week!

A BIG THANK YOU to all backers :wink:

I sent the link to every diver I know personally. I don't know if they backed, but I'm super stoked that it funded! Can't wait to see them built.
 
I missed it... F#@k, Now I gotta pay full price... Can I pre-order one ?... Please..

Jim...
 
Cool... I thought once it was funded it was done... I'll do it in the morning when I get home on my big computer... I'm not very good on this smart phone... The phone is fine, I'm not..

Jim...
 
Why do you assume that the purpose of coming up with a good product name was so that someone could "override an engineering decision"?
Because the other alternative is that the engineering team would be influenced by a product name (note I'm not referring to the manufacturer) rather than the price/performance.

That path would require a new engineering team
 
Because the other alternative is that the engineering team would be influenced by a product name (note I'm not referring to the manufacturer) rather than the price/performance.

That path would require a new engineering team

Why do you assume those are the only two reasons to come up with a good name?

(Why do you assume engineers aren't influenceable?)

:D
 
Seems so straight forward, why haven't the two been combined before?
 
Seems so straight forward, why haven't the two been combined before?
From some other threads, I've gotten the impression that sufficiently accurate CO sensors have been pretty expensive in the past. Most seemed to require frequent calibration as well, which was apparently somewhat awkward.

My guess is that the necessary components have finally dropped to an economically feasible price point. Throw in the bluetooth/smartphone support to simplify calibration and data tracking, and a real-world business case finally becomes viable.

I've got high hopes for this beastie. (-;
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom