Good for you that you can check the tank at the dive center DD, good for you if you can use YOUR gear all the time, but that just IS NOT THE CASE for everyone, especially not divers who have to travel to be able to dive.
Also in a lot of locations the tanks is handled by a "central filling station" not located at the dive shops, which means not even the shop get to test the tanks untill they are delivered.
As a customer, you don't have to accept something that you're not happy about. Attach your regulator, crank a valve.. hey, presto! If it's a low fill, then refuse it... then it's the shop's problem.
I don't see what the issue is here. If you're worried about short fills, then check your tanks
before it's too late.
You won't convince me that it is impossible to check a tank before you depart on a boat etc. Just turn up a little early, if necessary... what's the problem?
All part and parcel of being a diligent, well-prepared diver IMHO.
Of course.... that's all
ignoring the point I've been trying to get across - about the use of two tanks for a dive. That solves the issue of low-fills. It solves the problem of insufficient gas for the planned dive, especially where nitrox is used. It solves the problem of redundant gas for emergencies.
Go figure... you argue that insufficient gas is a problem... and then you argue that having extra gas is irrelevant. Not got the logic sorted on this one yet?
You(and the agencies) can call the sidemount course recreational or tech or whatever, but how many rec divers do you really see with sidemounts? It IS for all intents and purposes irrelevant as its just not what most divers do.
Ah, ok... so it's just me... a sidemount instructor.... and the majority of agencies - that supply sidemount courses to a rapidly expanding demographic of recreational divers... that don't know what we're talking about? LMAO
The fact is that 90% of 'rec' divers don't even know what 'gas redundancy' or 'gas planning' is - that's an issue. In fact, it is THE issue that started this thread.
As an established contributor to Scubaboard, you are
not ignorant of such issues... so why hide behind those issues now, when faced with a solution that defies your debating stance on the '
need' to muddle through dives on a single tank that doesn't hold as much gas as you actually plan for/need?
What '
most divers do' and what '
most diver should do' are two entirely different notions. If there was no discrepency between those two states, then we'd have very few fruitful discussions here on Scubaboard. Are you really going to drag this debate to the lowest common denominator - and suggest that divers should just 'follow the herd' and do what the majority do... even if they know better???
We can help resolve that issue by educating divers about effective and safe solutions to their ignorance.......or we can stick our heads in the sand, use bastardized solutions for eeking out a few extra minutes on a dive and blinker ourselves to what our real options are.
I see you've gone for the latter course of action?