Merits of U-wing vs Doughnut-wing for bp/w

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Lenaxia

Contributor
Messages
378
Reaction score
14
Location
Seattle, WA
# of dives
200 - 499
Hey can you guys spell doughnut without skipping half the letters?

Anyway, the more pressing question is, is there anything wrong with using a U-wing over a doughnut wing for a bp/w?

I dive a Zeagle Brigade right now and am considering going to a BP/W at some point in the future (still a few months away).

I can easily take the cam bands and the wing off of the Brigade and they are usable for a BP. However are there any major reasons not to do this?

I'm already aware of the benefits of a doughnut wing overall (such as no trapped air, etc), but I'm looking for concerns that are BP specific.
 
Hey can you guys spell doughnut without skipping half the letters?

Doughnut:

PowederedDonut.jpg


Donut:

7010BP_Donut-bladder-front.jpg


Though personally, I take my doughnuts without the powdered sugar, and my donuts without the bungees.
 
Hey can you guys spell doughnut without skipping half the letters?

Anyway, the more pressing question is, is there anything wrong with using a U-wing over a doughnut wing for a bp/w?

I dive a Zeagle Brigade right now and am considering going to a BP/W at some point in the future (still a few months away).

I can easily take the cam bands and the wing off of the Brigade and they are usable for a BP. However are there any major reasons not to do this?

I'm already aware of the benefits of a doughnut wing overall (such as no trapped air, etc), but I'm looking for concerns that are BP specific.

A few *FACTS*

Gas always goes to the high point in any BC or wing. ALWAYS

Now consider a horizontally trimmed diver using any wing. The gas in the wing will be in two bubbles, each running down along side the cylinder.

There will be *NO* gas in the lower arc if the wing is a donut. Why? Because the lower arc is beneath the lower end of the cylinder. The lower arc of a donut wing, for a horizontally trimmed diver is the *LOWEST* part of the wing.

To actually shift gas through the lower arc of a donut wing requires that the lower arc become the high point of the wing, i.e. higher than the gas in the side pontoons.

This requires the diver be about 45 degrees heads down......

When is precision venting most important? During ascents. Do you plan on making butt first ascents on purpose?;)

The gas in a donut wing doesn't know it's in a donut wing and no longer bound by the laws of physics, in short the gas in a donut wing won't go downhill, under the cylinder and up to the other side.

Other Donut myths:

"Donut wings provide lift at the divers hips"

No, not really, wings provide lift only where there is gas in them. With no gas in the lower arc a donut wing cannot provide lift at the hips. If you need lift at the hips a wing that's wider at the hips is the answer.

"Donut wings allow the gas to circulate"

Gas does not circulate in a wing. You add it when you need more and vent when you need less.

"You can't trap gas on one side of a donut wing to offset the weight of stages"

To move gas from one side of a donut wing to the other requires either raising your shoulder slightly to shift gas in the top arc, or going ~45 degrees heads down to fill the lower arc with gas. Both of these requires intentional changes in trim. Once again the gas in a donut doesn't know it's in a donut wing.

What makes a wing easy to vent or hard to vent is the amount of tank wrap. A wide center panel, oversized wing will have lots of tank wrap. Tank = hotdog, wing = bun.

Lots of wrap means the diver has to break trim in order to move the gas into the top arc.

With a narrow center panel, and proper volume tank wrap is reduced and the diver need not raise their should much to shift gas through the top arc.

Why are there so many over the top near magical claims made for the benefits of donut wings?

I suspect that many have had the experience of using a poorly designed, wide profile, over sized gas trapping horseshoe, and then had the chance to use a dedicated smaller volume single tank wing that happened to be a donut.

The smaller wing was easier to dive, but not because it was a donut.

We offer both horeshoe and donut style wings. All DSS wings feature a 3 inch wide center panel, narrow profile and we can match the capacity to the application.

Have I used both horseshoe and donut wings? Yes as you might imagine designing and testing 16 wing designs involves quite a bit of testing of both types.

Beyond that I can tell you that I have removed the bladders from donut wings, rf welded the bladders shut at the lower arc and reinstalled them into the wing shells.

Test divers could not tell the difference..............

Donut wings aren't evil, there are many fine products to choose from, but they also aren't "magical" instantly transforming any user into a perfect diver.

Tobin
 
I you dive head down and vent, you will become unbalanced since the air will be left on one side and spin to your death:D

Seriously, the bigger issue in transplanting you wing from the brigade will be do the holes line up and is the wing excessively wide. I know the ranger wing, while well made, is really wide and it going to taco around the tank. I don't really know about the brigade. Since Zeagle products have a decent resell price, you might think about buying the proper wing / plate system and selling the old BC intact.
 
I you dive head down and vent, you will become unbalanced since the air will be left on one side and spin to your death:D

Seriously, the bigger issue in transplanting you wing from the brigade will be do the holes line up and is the wing excessively wide. I know the ranger wing, while well made, is really wide and it going to taco around the tank. I don't really know about the brigade. Since Zeagle products have a decent resell price, you might think about buying the proper wing / plate system and selling the old BC intact.

That was my main concern, but then again, I run into this issue regardless of whether or not I'm using a BP or the vest.

The Brigade uses the Escape bladder so its only 35lbs; smaller and a bit narrower. Before I make the swap I'd check it against whatever BP I'm buying of course; to make sure that it'd actually work.

The Escape bladder also is bungeed along the outer edge and has grommets at the bottom that I could sexbolt to the BP; I suspect tacoing won't be a problem.

As you said though, Zeagle products do have a decent resell so I may very well do just that. If I switch the wing over, I'll just have a vest portion sitting there being completely useless, so yeah, in the end selling it off as a whole would probably be a better idea.


@cool: Thanks for the rundown, glad to know that my understanding of wings isn't off base. The basic physics don't escape me, I'd be a rather sad engineer if that were the case. I ask anyway though because there may be some random obscure, totally out-there fact that when the Stellar alignment's are correct and when you think you're DIR compliant, that pair of red spotted underwear under your thermals gets you killed... because it wasn't all black...
 
I have a Golem 35# ring wing and the standard Golem 35# wing. They look the same externally, are the same size, and, to be honest, I don't notice any difference in the way they dive.
 
I you dive head down and vent, you will become unbalanced since the air will be left on one side and spin to your death:D

Seriously, the bigger issue in transplanting you wing from the brigade will be do the holes line up and is the wing excessively wide. I know the ranger wing, while well made, is really wide and it going to taco around the tank. I don't really know about the brigade. Since Zeagle products have a decent resell price, you might think about buying the proper wing / plate system and selling the old BC intact.

I have dived both horseshoe-shaped and doughnut-shaped wings. Neither was better or worse than the other.

I have on occasion found myself ascending when I didn't want to ascend. If in a wetsuit I simply swam downwards while venting air from the bottom dump of the bladder. Doughnut or horseshoe - there was no real difference. Sure, with a single-dump horseshoe the air can become unevenly distributed, but as soon as you level out (after dumping air) it redistributes itself evenly. Even with a small wing (my horseshoe is 24# lift - a bit small for cold water) I have never found the need to dump air from both sides of the horseshoe to solve an unwanted ascent.

Edit: GrumpyOldGuy, I know that you were being sarcastic. I was just adding my voice to yours. :)
 
Last edited:
^^ I was being sarcastic - hence the :D

I agree, with a well designed, properly sized wing the difference is trivial, on the same scale as should the inflating hose be centered or offset. For most of use, we can't tell the difference.
 
I'm a fan of donuts. Start of the dive, I roll from the boat with a ~full wing. I swim down and burp from the bottom dump.

During the dive, I try to stay horizontal and dump from the bottom OPV. Sometimes I do have to swing my hip.

Usually never have to touch my inflator again until I begin to surface. I shoot my DSMB from almost vertical and hang on the line.

Oh, when I get home, I seldom have any water in my wing.
 
As I am attempting to take pictures underwater, I sometimes find myself in strange inverted positions, I think the donut is a bit easier to vent in some strange position......

But this is just me.........

My first wing was a U.......no issues diving it at all.......but if I had to pick one it would be a donut.......

M
 

Back
Top Bottom