New tech diver seeks computer advice

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

What table do you use for 30min at 150FSW?

1:1 = 30 minutes


Your point may be (reading between the lines) that it's not a "table" per se, but that wasn't really Richard's point.
 
1:1 = 30 minutes


Your point may be (reading between the lines) that it's not a "table" per se, but that wasn't really Richard's point.

But telling a neophyte "use a BT and a table" if he meant "use ratio deco" is more than a bit misleading/confusing, no?
 
But telling a neophyte "use a BT and a table" if he meant "use ratio deco" is more than a bit misleading/confusing, no?

Maybe, maybe not. Many of us are intentionally obtuse in our posts (tek to tek subforum notwithstanding) so as to not hand over a potentially fatal recipe. That said, I have enough respect for Richard that I won't speak for him.
 

Thanks for the link.

<<Based on the RGBM algorithm developed by Dr. Bruce Wienke, widely recognized decompression scientist, the Suunto Technical RGMB algorithm extends decompression flexibility into the world of technical diving.>>

Call me sceptical but what does "Based On" mean ?

What advantages does it have over tried and tested Buhlman with Gradient factors or V-planner ?
 
So, once I put that Cobra in gauge mode I am forced to specifically plan on paper every dive for the entire trip, when I really would like to "just dive" the shallow rec dives with a general dive plan.

If you're comfortable enough doing tech dives with a BT/DG combo "just diving" shallow rec dives shouldn't be a big deal.

My goal in determining what dive computer to purchase is to get something that works very well for me now, and that will work for me for at least a few years to come.

IMO, the best way for you to accomplish this goal is to identify the classes that you think you want to take, research them, talk to others who took those classes and talk with instructors. Find out what equipment is required for the class and why and once you've completed the class you'll have your own foundation for determining what you need and more importantly why you need it.

Ask 5 divers what gear is the best choice and you'll likely get 7 answers. Until you truly understand your needs the responses can just end up muddying the waters. Get all the opinions you want, but I'd recommend holding off on purchasing til you've got a better grasp on the fundamentals.
 
Call me sceptical but what does "Based On" mean ?
It means "We don't have the license to use the actual RGBM, so we've made up our own algorithm that we think is probably close because our profiles end up similar?" :D
 
You know, I wonder if it makes any difference. GF are just a kludge on Buhlmann to reshape the curve. No one dives VPM any more, had to give Boyle his due (VPM-B) & add in a critical volume algo for a much nicer shaped curve.

Suunto may be using an emulation of RGBM. But if it's doing so by generating decent profiles, so what? Isn't that what being an informed & thinking diver means, to be able to look at the output & say wether I do or don't like the decay rate on that curve?
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom