Off the wall - I must admit that I would be leary about doing business with you. Not saying that I would since the geographical distance is a hinderance if my opinion. My concern is with how you mix the the facts regarding economic theories. I believe at one point you claimed that MARP was "communist" but in my books, government interference in dictating which specific business models are allowed to exist sounds a lot more like communism to me then the free market you are claiming you want. So I get the feeling you might not completely understand what you are saying and in fact may be trying to grind an axe with these companies (whichever ones they are) and trying to disguise it. So in my opinion you are getting close to the line of BS'ing your customers and trying to pull the wool over their eyes. Not saying this is the case - just pointing out that this is how my opinion is starting to form.
However, I was intrigued by your statement that you promote service to your customers as well as top notch training. So I would like to get your read on value of quality instruction and what it should be worth? There have been countless threads about cheap courses and the detriment this is causing to diving in general. Since you are advocating a low(er) margin, high(er) volume equipment model then do you a) advocate for the same in training structure, b) if not "a" then why should training be different then equipment? I guess I am asking in a round about way is, is your business model based on exploiting stores that use equipment sales to subsidize courses or is there another component that I'm not seeing?
However, I was intrigued by your statement that you promote service to your customers as well as top notch training. So I would like to get your read on value of quality instruction and what it should be worth? There have been countless threads about cheap courses and the detriment this is causing to diving in general. Since you are advocating a low(er) margin, high(er) volume equipment model then do you a) advocate for the same in training structure, b) if not "a" then why should training be different then equipment? I guess I am asking in a round about way is, is your business model based on exploiting stores that use equipment sales to subsidize courses or is there another component that I'm not seeing?