Religion is not against the Terms of Service, only politics. Politics is now allowed in the Pub.
oops. :11doh:
thanks for the precision Ann Marie

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Religion is not against the Terms of Service, only politics. Politics is now allowed in the Pub.
Religion is not against the Terms of Service, only politics.
In respect to keeping off-topic posts out of this thread, I would welcome you to post that question to members in the PUB.![]()
I'll never agree that boiling chickens alive, force-feeding animals with pipes down their throats or making animals live in spaces only inches bigger than themselves for their entire lives is humane.
I am sorry, you've lost me. Where did I say that chickens are boiled alive? When chicken and turkeys are killed, they are stunned by an electrical current, then their neck is cut with an electric knife. If they are not dead from the cut, they soon exanguinate from loss of blood. Then they are plucked with a mechanical plucker. Who boils chicken alive? Never heard of that before.
Who force feed animals with pipes down their throat? That is simply not economically feasible. Only veterinarian trained to use a stethescope can thread a gastric tube down the right pipe, and only to administer medications. You've totally lost me here. It is a difficult and involved procedure - naso gastric feeding, and is used only for feeding very sick animals.
Yes, the only point you've got correct is that animals are often confined to very tight spaces. A point I've made all along, and it is cruel. But where does that play here, when I was pointing out that slaughter houses do humanely kill animals. I also pointed out that the transportation, holding, and pre-kill handling of animals in the slaughter house need to be looked at for cruelty.
I am sorry, you've lost me. Where did I say that chickens are boiled alive? When chicken and turkeys are killed, they are stunned by an electrical current, then their neck is cut with an electric knife. If they are not dead from the cut, they soon exanguinate from loss of blood. Then they are plucked with a mechanical plucker. Who boils chicken alive? Never heard of that before.
Who force feed animals with pipes down their throat? That is simply not economically feasible. Only veterinarian trained to use a stethescope can thread a gastric tube down the right pipe, and only to administer medications. You've totally lost me here. It is a difficult and involved procedure - naso gastric feeding, and is used only for feeding very sick animals.
Yes, the only point you've got correct is that animals are often confined to very tight spaces. A point I've made all along, and it is cruel. But where does that play here, when I was pointing out that slaughter houses do humanely kill animals. I also pointed out that the transportation, holding, and pre-kill handling of animals in the slaughter house need to be looked at for cruelty.
I've also never heard of boiling chickens alive? Why? What's the point?Who would film chickens being boiled alive? Now that would be sick, in a very perverted way.
I've also never heard of boiling chickens alive? Why? What's the point?
Lobsters and other sea food sure. Most people don't seem to have a problem with that though.
Heres just one unbelieveable statement from the president of PETA, Ingrid Newkirk:
Six million people died in concentration camps, but six billion broiler chickens [emphasis added] will die this year in slaughterhouses./QUOTE]