DIR- Generic Marked stages filled with lower O2?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I think I've seen GUE Rec 3 (now Master Diver) graduates carrying stages marked "70" (ft) or "21" (m) and filled with nitrox 32%. I never took that course myself so I'm not completely clear on how they do it. Is it considered within standards?


FWIW, I took this class. My instructor was noncommittal during class as to what markings were appropriate for the bottle. It was kind of confusing because all trimix dives in the class involve using the Al80 as a decompression bottle. You switch at 70' to the Al80 which contains 32%.

Now, I ended up after the class with a mix of bottles. All containing 32% but with both 100 and 70 stickers.

When I took Tech 1, I was told by my instructor to consider only keeping 50% in bottles marked 70 and 32% in bottles marked 100. Part of rationale being that you don't want to end up in a scenario where you take a bottle that is marked 70 but that contains 32% on a real T1 dive. The other issue is that you might end up doing a dive with a bottle that you think is a stage with 32%, but really contains 50%.

Since then, I am pretty rigorous in ensuring that my Al80s that have a 100 sticker on them only contain 32%, and the ones with a 70 sticker on them only contain 50%.

After all, the only place I see myself at home as using an Al80 with 32% is using it as a stage. Even if I do a dive with unadjusted deco of 15 minutes and max depth of 130', I don't see the point of restricting myself to a 32% deco bottle.
 
FWIW, I took this class. My instructor was noncommittal during class as to what markings were appropriate for the bottle. It was kind of confusing because all trimix dives in the class involve using the Al80 as a decompression bottle. You switch at 70' to the Al80 which contains 32%.

Now, I ended up after the class with a mix of bottles. All containing 32% but with both 100 and 70 stickers.

When I took Tech 1, I was told by my instructor to consider only keeping 50% in bottles marked 70 and 32% in bottles marked 100. Part of rationale being that you don't want to end up in a scenario where you take a bottle that is marked 70 but that contains 32% on a real T1 dive. The other issue is that you might end up doing a dive with a bottle that you think is a stage with 32%, but really contains 50%.

Since then, I am pretty rigorous in ensuring that my Al80s that have a 100 sticker on them only contain 32%, and the ones with a 70 sticker on them only contain 50%.

After all, the only place I see myself at home as using an Al80 with 32% is using it as a stage. Even if I do a dive with unadjusted deco of 15 minutes and max depth of 130', I don't see the point of restricting myself to a 32% deco bottle.

This is a bit confusing. MOD in the end is the maximum operative depth, not the depth where the team agree to switch, so to me it makes sense to properly mark the tank even if the team plan to switch at a shallower depth. Are you aware why during REC3 you had to mark tanks with the planned switch depth instead of the MOD?
 
This is a bit confusing. MOD in the end is the maximum operative depth, not the depth where the team agree to switch, so to me it makes sense to properly mark the tank even if the team plan to switch at a shallower depth. Are you aware why during REC3 you had to mark tanks with the planned switch depth instead of the MOD?

Like, I said my R3 instructor was non-committal on whether a MOD 70 or MOD 100 sticker was needed for the 32% deco bottles I was using. IIRC, I used bottles marked 100 in the class and during R3 dives but came out of it with a shaky understanding of why it mattered. Which is why I ended up bottles with MOD 70 at home, but filled with 32%. Partly because at that time I didn't want to have a gas that I wasn't certified to breathe at home.

During my T1, we went over why markings mattered. And furthermore, why the fact that my 70 bottles at that time had 32% might be an issue. Thus reinforcing in my head why the label refers to Maximum Operating Depth and the concerns that arise in having 32%.

In fact, every dive we did during Tech 1 involved switching to a MOD 70 bottle with 50% from day one.

Incidentally, my opinion as a student after taking both classes was that that the Rec 3 class is a weird thing that doesn't quite fit smoothly in the GUE flow of classes. The only big benefit I got from it was that I got to learn about decompression theory from two different instructors.
 
What is the current thinking on filling stage tanks with an FO₂ lower than that normally indicated by the MOD sticker? Like I've seen divers do training and skills practice with stages marked "70" (ft) or "21" (m) but filled with 21% or 32% instead of 50%. This is totally safe from a maximum operating depth perspective: the tank can be breathed at 70ft without exceeding any limits. But if you accidentally bring that stage on a real tech dive you'll have a bad day.
Leaving practice aside for a minute - what is supposed to happen during a real i.e. mandatory gas switch.

Lets say for instance that a diver has taken along a stage marked 21 (or 70) with Nitrox 32 rather than 50 or a stage marked 6 (or 20) containing Nitrox 32 or air rather than oxygen.

Where should the switch occur - at 30 m to the "50" stage since after all the stage contains Nx 32 rather than Nx 50 ? Sounds dubious.

What is the diver's buddy supposed to verify during gas switch - depth vs. mod sticker or depth vs. the hard to read analysis sticker? Which of these reflects the "true" content of the stage if they disagree? Sounds dubious.

And back to practice for a minute - should the divers be practicing switching at the wrong depth or to the wrong gas or having analysis stickers override mod stickers?

While this practice may be harmless on a min deco NDL dive in my view at least this encourages bad habits.
 
Variables kill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OTF
Leaving practice aside for a minute - what is supposed to happen during a real i.e. mandatory gas switch.

Lets say for instance that a diver has taken along a stage marked 21 (or 70) with Nitrox 32 rather than 50 or a stage marked 6 (or 20) containing Nitrox 32 or air rather than oxygen.

Where should the switch occur - at 30 m to the "50" stage since after all the stage contains Nx 32 rather than Nx 50 ? Sounds dubious.
Obviously you would never switch deeper than the MOD sticker.
What is the diver's buddy supposed to verify during gas switch - depth vs. mod sticker or depth vs. the hard to read analysis sticker? Which of these reflects the "true" content of the stage if they disagree? Sounds dubious.
The buddy verifies depth versus the MOD sticker during the gas switch. The diver also verifies their own gas analysis sticker as the final step in the gas switch protocol.

In general I agree it is dubious to fill a stage with a lower oxygen mix than indicated by the MOD sticker. But I was trying to understand the current thinking in the DIR community about this practice.
And back to practice for a minute - should the divers be practicing switching at the wrong depth or to the wrong gas or having analysis stickers override mod stickers?
An analysis sticker can never override an MOD sticker in terms of maximum switch depth. I'm not sure what you mean by "wrong depth". There's nothing wrong with switching at a shallower depth than the MOD sticker. We do that sometimes for shallow water skills practice, or on real dives if appropriate for the profile. Like if your first mandatory deco stop is at 40ft then you don't need to switch to 50% at 70ft, just keep moving up and switch at a shallower depth.
 
I think I've seen GUE Rec 3 (now Master Diver) graduates carrying stages marked "70" (ft) or "21" (m) and filled with nitrox 32%. I never took that course myself so I'm not completely clear on how they do it. Is it considered within standards?

Huh, in my Rec 3 class we labeled the 32% cylinder with 30 (meters), since that's the MOD of 32%....
It was much harder to find nice 30 m MOD stickers than for 21 m, but i learnt to label MOD accurately. Always.
 
What is the diver's buddy supposed to verify during gas switch - depth vs. mod sticker or depth vs. the hard to read analysis sticker? Which of these reflects the "true" content of the stage if they disagree? Sounds dubious.

And back to practice for a minute - should the divers be practicing switching at the wrong depth or to the wrong gas or having analysis stickers override mod stickers?

An analysis sticker can never override an MOD sticker in terms of maximum switch depth. I'm not sure what you mean by "wrong depth". There's nothing wrong with switching at a shallower depth than the MOD sticker. We do that sometimes for shallow water skills practice, or on real dives if appropriate for the profile. Like if your first mandatory deco stop is at 40ft then you don't need to switch to 50% at 70ft, just keep moving up and switch at a shallower depth.


If the MOD and analysis stickers don't align and you're not sure why they're not lining up, treat it as lost gas. This is also why it's important to put the blank stickers on all of the bottles, and then as you analyze the bottle write on the blank sticker already on the tank.

I think a lot of people (myself included previously) would write on the sticker when it's still on the roll of stickers and then stick it on the tank. When you're diving just back gas it's kinda ok, but once you start having a team with multiple stages it becomes increasingly easy to label the wrong cylinder with the wrong piece of tape when you're standing there with 3 peoples worth of gear. It's pretty easy for that to be turn into 6 sets of doubles, and 9+ stages...
 

Back
Top Bottom