Storker: we are in complete agreement then.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Thanks. They are a few technical hurdles though, but as you said, nothing breaking the laws of physics.There are some big differences between this and the Triton scam:
1. It isn't claiming to do anything that is proveably impossible, breaking multiple laws of physics on the way - in fact everything they are claiming to be able to do sounds fairly reasonable, and much of what they are pitching is already commonplace, they are just packaging it nicely. (In contrast to Triton's laughably far-fetched fantasy bull****.)
The working prototype is... working. It is ugly, it does not realize all the features we would like to onboard on the final product, yet it proves that the acoustic part of the positioning technology works. We developed it with experts from the underwater industry here in France, using previous works they've done (for exemple for the french army's combat divers). This prototype has also been filmed by a crew of the Canadian Discovery Chanel - it should be available within a few days - if it can reassure you.2. There are clear and quite believable videos of working prototypes shown. (In contrast to Triton's clumsy fakery.)
To answer another question, we have some expertise in cost breakdown of goods. The price is a bottom up of all cost, bill of material, transformation cost, customs, shipment, amortization of R&D and other expenses, taxes, etc. We tried to achieve a price point that would be acceptable - I know it is not cheap, but there is technology inside, that cost a lot.3. They are asking what seems at first glance to be a realistic price. (In contrast to Triton's pitch of at least four Nobel-prize-winning breakthroughs all yours for $300 in four colours.)
4. They appear to have people with actual relevant engineering and diving experience on the team. (In contrast to Triton's team of graphic designer, salesman and marketing dude.)
I couldn't say better.5. Some big names in the underwater world are supporting them, and they aren't going to want to be associated with a debacle. (In contrast to Triton where anyone who knows anything are calling them out as scammers.)
1. We have chosen Flexible campaign, because it is the only way to have both Paypal and credit card payment available on Indiegogo: How much does Indiegogo cost? Fees & PricingThere are a few cautions:
1. Flexible funding, means they get the money even if they don't hit target (and no conrtact to actually deliver anything either way).
2. Looks like a pretty aggressive delivery schedule.
3. They still have some pretty hard technical nuts still to crack, such as obstacle avoidance. (This doesn't break any laws of physics, but is a hard enough technical challenge above water, let alone beneath it.)
4. There are a bunch of practicality questions - like as above how it would work in currents? Failure modes? Would it only be useable in ideal pool-like conditions? etc.
5. It's on Indiegogo, who are not exactly covering themselves with glory as far as supporting dodgy projects goes at the moment.