This overbalanced thing is really starting to annoy me. Balanced 1st stages are designed to maintain IP throughout the range of supply pressures. "Overbalanced" in this case has nothing to do with IP and supply pressure, its about (supposedly) increasing IP at depth; more like "over depth compensating" than "over balancing." And as Luis pointed out, it's meaningless with a balanced 2nd stage, because as the IP increases, the 2nd stage will simply compensate for that.
There is the theory that the higher IP would result in a higher flow rate to the 2nd stage, but since any high performing 1st stage delivers 3 times the air (or more) that any 2nd stage can handle, it's also meaningless.
Far better to design a 1st stage that has a smaller IP drop under high flow; IP itself is a static measurement and as such doesn't tell you anything about how air is moving to the 2nd stage.