RickSp
Guest
I just got back from a wonderful trip to Bonaire. The dive shop that we were using, Bonaire Dive and Adventure, offered Nitrox (certification as well as tanks). Being relative novices we happily used compressed air.
I am trying to understand the practical benefits of Nitrox. I understand that it gives you longer potential bottom time, or inversely a greater margin of safety. That's great. What doesn't necessarily make sense to me is what this means in practice. One source I read quotes a no-decompression time with compressed air of 80 minutes at 50' and 200 minutes with Nitrox at the same depth. Of course, with a standard 80 cu ft aluminum tank I will probably use my available air in about 50-60 minutes depending on water temperature, so while I would be absorbing a lot less nitrogen with Nitrox, my bottom time would be limited not by no decompression time limits but by my tank size.
I have heard and read that Nitrox is less fatiguing than diving with compressed air and that it can also keep you warmer. This may be the case but speaking with one diver we met on the trip, ( a highly unscientific survey) he commented that he didn't notice a difference when breathing Nitrox as compaired to compressed air. I also noted a fellow diver breathing Nitrox who always seemed to come up shivering, though she was wearing a full wet suit while I was wearing a shortie. (Significant only because I have a reputation as a real cold water wimp.)
I will admit to feeling exhausted at the end of each day after two dives, but them I also felt exahusted after a day's snorkeling with my eight year old.
So, is Nitrox the air of the future or a passing fad? Any opinions?
Rick
I am trying to understand the practical benefits of Nitrox. I understand that it gives you longer potential bottom time, or inversely a greater margin of safety. That's great. What doesn't necessarily make sense to me is what this means in practice. One source I read quotes a no-decompression time with compressed air of 80 minutes at 50' and 200 minutes with Nitrox at the same depth. Of course, with a standard 80 cu ft aluminum tank I will probably use my available air in about 50-60 minutes depending on water temperature, so while I would be absorbing a lot less nitrogen with Nitrox, my bottom time would be limited not by no decompression time limits but by my tank size.
I have heard and read that Nitrox is less fatiguing than diving with compressed air and that it can also keep you warmer. This may be the case but speaking with one diver we met on the trip, ( a highly unscientific survey) he commented that he didn't notice a difference when breathing Nitrox as compaired to compressed air. I also noted a fellow diver breathing Nitrox who always seemed to come up shivering, though she was wearing a full wet suit while I was wearing a shortie. (Significant only because I have a reputation as a real cold water wimp.)
I will admit to feeling exhausted at the end of each day after two dives, but them I also felt exahusted after a day's snorkeling with my eight year old.
So, is Nitrox the air of the future or a passing fad? Any opinions?
Rick