Bite me, I AM an invertebrate specialist. :05: What, you think we can look at pictures of any critter without a backbone and whip out species names? I can't even do that for animals within my own sub-specialty.Mike Veitch:Heres a couple of example of a Bobtail and second a Cuttlefish hatchling. The bobtail does look remarkably like a cuttlefish i think as well. But my buddy who took the photos is a marine biologist specializing in Indo West Pacific marine life. I really think Calypsonick's first photo truly shows the characteristics of a squid as opposed to a cuttle. But you may be right, i think we need a invert specialist to tell us...
Bobtail's and cuttlefish were originally lumped in the same taxon for very good reason; they bear a close resemblance to one another. I don't recall why they were recently split, maybe something to do with the cuttlebone, or lack thereof. They are VERY hard to tell apart when they're teeny like this. Bobtail's are supposed to have more rounded posteriors than cuttlefish, but that's a very loose diagnostic, and not very useful from the photo angles. Usually soft-bodied cephalopods are tagged by painstaking examination of the tentacles and suckers, bleah.
Getting an ID would be difficult, even for a cephalopod specialist. Best bet's to get a regional cephalopod expert to figure it out. Keep in mind that new species in these groups are still being reported in the Indo-Pacific.
One of the guys at the University of Texas Medical Branch studies these things in this part of the world. I forget his name and their website's not working for me at the moment, but www.cephbase.org is usually up. It might be Jim Wood that's the man to contact.
Another big cephalopod research site is here.
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/eurosquid/
There's an e-list to post questions, though I've never used it.