Ontario Diver:What should define wrecks to be protected?
Does a blanket approach (ie. all shipwrecks and aircraft wrecks underwater for X number of years) good or bad?
Well...... clearly the risk you run with picking a random date is both of including wrecks that are just old junk and excluding what are probably bona fide heritage sites (consider the Edmund Fitzgerald) but that aren't old enough to fit the criteria yet. It also seems ridiculous to me that a wreck could be free for plundering (I mean diving) for let's say 50 years and THEN get protected...... that's the world on it's head. If it's worth protecting after 50 years then you have to protect it from the moment it sinks.
I think a better blanket inclusion is "ALL unowned wrecks" period. That's clear for everybody.
R..