InTheDrink
Contributor
Leapfrog - agreed and we're hijacking this post and yes, I started it so sorry. I don't think we have a difference of opinion. J
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I see it could work for a set exposure suit setup, but if you dive wet and dry, or layer optionally, it wouldn't seem to be as convenient.The rubber belt has more than enough stretch to compensate for even the most extreme suit compression, you adjust it so it is snug on the surface and forget it.
The Seaquest buckle is an alternative positive closure device, of a truly ingenious design, it is easy to tighten with one hand and easy to ditch with one hand, it's only drawback is that it is not a good choice for a very heavy belt.
Once you learn how you can readjust it in seconds and add or subtract weight in a minute.I see it could work for a set exposure suit setup, but if you dive wet and dry, or layer optionally, it wouldn't seem to be as convenient.
Yes, the adjustable side does exactly that, up to 28 lbs or so.On the SeaQuest, I guess you pull the handle end to release. Does the adjustable side hold without creeping?
ive had this happen but ever since using the Trident spring-loaded stainless steel buckle never had a problem. the buckle compensates for compression at depth. its genius.