Sergio Buonanno
Registered
I’m a software engineer and diving enthusiast and I owns a Uwatec Galileo SOL for 3 months. Last week I was lucky to test the Uemis SDA and I’m here to give you some impressions after comparing Uemis ZURICH SDA against my Galileo SOL.
First of all it couldn’t pass unnoticed the outstanding OLED display of Umeis’ SDA. This is for sure its strongest point as Galileo LCD’s is its weakest.
The Uemis SDA’s OLED display is perfectly visible in all conditions even in cloudy water with visibility less than 1m while Galileo’s LCD in cloudy water or darkness shows all its limits. At maximum contrast the situation is slightly better but is not enough. Increasing Galileo’s contrast introduces another drawback, you won’t read menu items when selected.
Galileo’s Polar Heart Beat sensor gives further data to calculate workload and decompression times and it is really a nice and useful feature. Another advantage of Galileo is the presence of a compass that Uemis’ SDA hasn’t.
While I didn’t experience any problem with Uemis’s tank transmitter (but I used it just once for a 45 minutes dive with max. depth of 21 meters), my Galileo from time to time loses signal for a few seconds and to fix it I must move the wrist near the first stage.
Information offered by these two computers are really detailed and maybe Galileo is a little more precise in computing deco stops, offering slightly better flexibility, but all in all they are very complete systems and they match each other in this area.
I like Uemis’ wrist strap, it fits better the wrist compared to Galileo’s standard rubber strap, but I don’t really see a real advantage in having solar cells mounted directly on the computer. A separate solar cell charger would have saved space and maybe the addition of a compass would have been more appreciated.
Uemis ZURICH SDA
Pros
Outstanding OLED display. This is a state of the art piece of electronics
Simple and easy to understand graphics
Easy to operate
Comfortable wrist strap
Cons
No user replaceable rechargeable battery. I’ve read the battery life is about 3-4 years, but rechargeable batteries tend to lose capacity in time and after just one year of normal use you could notice a difference with shorter recharging intervals.
Compass is missing
Solar cells mounted directly on the unit. This is strictly a personal point of view. Even if solar cells can offer some recharging capability in shallow waters (depending on the weather) I don’t really see a real benefit in having such a feature in the computer. I don’t think normal people would dive with a discharged computer and I believe a separate solar cells recharger would have been enough. But that’s just my opinion.
Buttons response is a little delayed.
Some data, like dive time, tank pressure, temperature and others are displayed with a too small font.
Missing color customization. For example, I think (and I’m not the only one) that the orange color for warnings looks similar to the red used for alarms. When you dive you want important information to be clear and readable at a glance, small fonts and not quickly distinguishable colors do not help. Maybe yellow for warning and red for alarms would have been more appropriate, but even better the possibility to choose your preferred colors.
Uwatec Galileo SOL
Pros
Polar Heart Beat sensor. Really useful in statistical and workload calculations.
Easy to operate.
Decompression calculation algorithm.
Compass. Really useful and rather precise with a generous operating angle.
User replaceable battery (not rechargeable).
Cons
Poor monochromatic LCD display. Insufficient contrast. Slow refresh in cold waters. Overall performance below expectation for such a complex and expensive computer. Backlight in darkness is not powerful enough.
Remote transmitter’s link from time to time drops unexpectedly.
Buttons sensitivity.
Difficult menu navigation with high contrast. Selected items are displayed in reverse, but with high contrast they appear as solid black rectangles.
I’ve read Uemis SDA have some reliability problems, certainly because it is a new product and I’m sure they are going to fix them shortly. My opinion is that I would exchange my Galileo with Uemis SDA right now, but unfortunately I have just spent 1000€ for it and my wife would never allow me to spend 1400€ more for a new Uemis SDA (unfortunately) so that I must wait…
The two computers use similar algorithms, so from the diver point of view they both offer more than enough data, but the Uemis SDA’s OLED display makes really the difference here.
Since the first day I used my Galileo I complained about its poor display, when I tried Uemis SDA I couldn’t take my eyes off the display…beautiful.
First of all it couldn’t pass unnoticed the outstanding OLED display of Umeis’ SDA. This is for sure its strongest point as Galileo LCD’s is its weakest.
The Uemis SDA’s OLED display is perfectly visible in all conditions even in cloudy water with visibility less than 1m while Galileo’s LCD in cloudy water or darkness shows all its limits. At maximum contrast the situation is slightly better but is not enough. Increasing Galileo’s contrast introduces another drawback, you won’t read menu items when selected.
Galileo’s Polar Heart Beat sensor gives further data to calculate workload and decompression times and it is really a nice and useful feature. Another advantage of Galileo is the presence of a compass that Uemis’ SDA hasn’t.
While I didn’t experience any problem with Uemis’s tank transmitter (but I used it just once for a 45 minutes dive with max. depth of 21 meters), my Galileo from time to time loses signal for a few seconds and to fix it I must move the wrist near the first stage.
Information offered by these two computers are really detailed and maybe Galileo is a little more precise in computing deco stops, offering slightly better flexibility, but all in all they are very complete systems and they match each other in this area.
I like Uemis’ wrist strap, it fits better the wrist compared to Galileo’s standard rubber strap, but I don’t really see a real advantage in having solar cells mounted directly on the computer. A separate solar cell charger would have saved space and maybe the addition of a compass would have been more appreciated.
Uemis ZURICH SDA
Pros
Outstanding OLED display. This is a state of the art piece of electronics
Simple and easy to understand graphics
Easy to operate
Comfortable wrist strap
Cons
No user replaceable rechargeable battery. I’ve read the battery life is about 3-4 years, but rechargeable batteries tend to lose capacity in time and after just one year of normal use you could notice a difference with shorter recharging intervals.
Compass is missing
Solar cells mounted directly on the unit. This is strictly a personal point of view. Even if solar cells can offer some recharging capability in shallow waters (depending on the weather) I don’t really see a real benefit in having such a feature in the computer. I don’t think normal people would dive with a discharged computer and I believe a separate solar cells recharger would have been enough. But that’s just my opinion.
Buttons response is a little delayed.
Some data, like dive time, tank pressure, temperature and others are displayed with a too small font.
Missing color customization. For example, I think (and I’m not the only one) that the orange color for warnings looks similar to the red used for alarms. When you dive you want important information to be clear and readable at a glance, small fonts and not quickly distinguishable colors do not help. Maybe yellow for warning and red for alarms would have been more appropriate, but even better the possibility to choose your preferred colors.
Uwatec Galileo SOL
Pros
Polar Heart Beat sensor. Really useful in statistical and workload calculations.
Easy to operate.
Decompression calculation algorithm.
Compass. Really useful and rather precise with a generous operating angle.
User replaceable battery (not rechargeable).
Cons
Poor monochromatic LCD display. Insufficient contrast. Slow refresh in cold waters. Overall performance below expectation for such a complex and expensive computer. Backlight in darkness is not powerful enough.
Remote transmitter’s link from time to time drops unexpectedly.
Buttons sensitivity.
Difficult menu navigation with high contrast. Selected items are displayed in reverse, but with high contrast they appear as solid black rectangles.
I’ve read Uemis SDA have some reliability problems, certainly because it is a new product and I’m sure they are going to fix them shortly. My opinion is that I would exchange my Galileo with Uemis SDA right now, but unfortunately I have just spent 1000€ for it and my wife would never allow me to spend 1400€ more for a new Uemis SDA (unfortunately) so that I must wait…
The two computers use similar algorithms, so from the diver point of view they both offer more than enough data, but the Uemis SDA’s OLED display makes really the difference here.
Since the first day I used my Galileo I complained about its poor display, when I tried Uemis SDA I couldn’t take my eyes off the display…beautiful.