It didn't really resolve anything. NOAA has a permit system that can be denied on any grounds for the Monitor. I think Gentile should have hit harder on the international waters argument.
On Monday I met James Delagado who ranted to me that all wrecks within 200 miles of the coast are owned and protected by our government. Let's see if that holds up in court.
Yeah, I think the question arises by what is meant by "owned and protected."
As long as I don't take anything (which I never do) then I wonder what they could legally say? The USS Monitor (rightly or wrongly) has a permit system in place. The McCulloch (AFAIK) doesn't so there doesn't seem to be anything that would prevent from legally diving it -- as long as they leave everything in place.
It is veering a bit off topic, but it seems like they could / should come up with a system that allows people who have gone through a process (NDA, legally agree not to disturb, etc.) could dive these sites. NOAA could benefit since they don't really have the resources to monitor changes in the wrecks and by allowing private citizens to submit photos, video, etc. they could keep track of them.
- brett