I will not discuss the tension thing; I thought it made sense to mention it, but it's a bit off-topic here, so we can continue in private if you want.
Divers need to ask further questions. I believe you questioned me earlier and I explained the reason.
True, and I appreciated it: thanks. But I did not mean that you do not have reasons; I can see you do. My mother tongue is not English, so maybe I did not manage to explain my thoughts very well: what I meant is that you do not present your reasoning.
A new diver doesn't need to be overloaded with too much technical detail.
True, but he needs to understand the process and the reasons behind the choices. I'll try to be clear:
- if you suggest something without explaining why, and the new diver follows your suggestion -> he is not making any choice. You are choosing something for him, which isn't good for two reasons. First of all, you, me, and everyone else here are nobody to decide for others. Secondly, if the new diver follows other people's suggestions blindly, he is not growing as a diver (and, as far as I understand, SB is a place to grow as a diver)
- if you explain what you think, the new diver can compare your suggestions with others. By comparing different ideas and approaches and testing them on the field, he can grow as a diver.
Besides he's going to do Intro into Tech with TDI.
No, he said he would do fundies, post
#44, and even if he were going through TDI, that wouldn't make any difference: the two courses are equivalent, assuming the instructors are good.
Yes, I can evaluate people on this forum.
I was specifically speaking about diving skills and diving psychology. No, you can't evaluate both of them here on the forum. But feel free to think whatever you want in this regard; I will not try to change your mind.