Underwater housing and Canon 600D

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

devocean

New
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All

Newbie poster so please be gentle :D After using a range of underwater compacts with less than desirable results I would like to get my Canon 600D under the water to get some shots. I have heard good reviews about the ikelite housings however I am wondering whether the camera will produce the same speed and clarity I get from it above water? I would like to add a strobe as well as I realise this will make a big difference.
Any help would be appreciated as I dont want to fork out $1300 for similiar results as a compact.
Cheers
Dan
 
The same speed and clarity you get from topside depends a lot on what kind of water you dive in and what you want to shoot. I can shoot my house from 300 feet away and read the house number on the side with a cheap kit lens. Underwater not so much.
For macro stuff of course you should have great clarity, (you will need the strobe). As for speed, I don't know what you mean about that. Focus speed? need more info.
Bill
 
i have decided on getting the canon 600d and going with the sea and sea housing for it since i have a strobe and the sea and sea take fibre optic as well as ttl im getting mine as a package deal for camera housing and flat port
GetAttachment.aspx
 
I have used the Ikelite housing for a compact. I have a metal housing (Nauticam) with a cropped sensor DSLR (Nikon D7000).

The Ikelite housings are well made and economical. However, they are essentially boxes. Being a box, the system is pretty bulky. Ikelite makes the controls work over a bit of distance to the camera body. The distance the controls operate over makes for a less than precise control of the camera. Now my metal housing is custom made for its particular camera body which means it fits much more closely to the camera making it more durable and more compact. All of this comes at a price. I think Ikelite housings come for something like $1,500 and metal housings start at the low $3,000. Now you will probably have strobes, ports, gears and so on. So the overall difference in price between an Ikelite system and a metal system may not be as great as one would think. But you still will pay about $2,000 more. It is your call on whether you think it is worth it.


The major drawback on a DSLR vs a compact (besides the price) is the size and weight of the system. My compact was pretty easy to pack away. The DSLR system with all it ports, strobes, housing, lenses, bodies and so on comes to nearly as much as my dive gear. Underwater it is much larger to handle but not that bad.

About the clarity of above water, not really. Underwater photography is a whole different world than surface photography. There are a number of issues to deal with. First off, you go down about 15' and there are no longer any reds. Longer wavelengths of light are absorbed in the water column. So if you want the natural colors, you have to bring your own lighting source down with you like strobes. I have taken shots of fish against what I thought were drab backgrounds. When I looked at the photos, what looked like greys and muddy browns were actually garish oranges. So if you want real color, your maximum shooting range is something like 5'.

Also, water has stuff suspended in it. If you want nice crisp photos, the closer you get the better. Again, long range is about 5'. So you either want to have really wide angle lenses. That is why the Tokina 10-17 lens is so very popular for cropped sensor cameras. You can shoot a photo of a diver from really close and get them in. It is not such an issue with macro photography because you are close by definition.

You might want to get The Underwater Photographyer by Martin Edge. It is a superb book. Reading it will give you a decent start on the challenges of underwater photography. Sure the book costs something but it is cheap compared to the money for a DSLR underwater system.
 
The wife and I are shooting with a 600d above water and and older G9/G11 below. So we are considering a housing for the DSLR as well... if your photography will benefit from it mainly depends on you - a 600d is superior to pretty much any compact in pretty much any measurable way possible. But if you photos really get better boils down to: How good are your pictures right now? Do you know what you are doing or simply snap around on full auto? If you do use all the manual options of an advanced compact like the G or S series... well, then it is time for an upgrade. If you do not, would you probably get a better improvement on your images with the same compact but a underwater photo course instead.

We are some 75% there... but I still feel that with more practice I can still improve a lot with my compact. Especially looking at the pics of one of the guys I learned from: underwater compact camera
His pictures are taken without any strobes or lights with an S100. A 600d has a much larger sensor so should take even better images without external light source. Just because a strobe makes it easier does not mean that there are no other ways to get color back into your photos.

P.S: I'd not go for an Ikelite but as the last post suggested - if then you want something that really fits and works. Nothing is as annoying as a bad functioning housing. I was once in "macro heaven" with a borrowed set where the Macro button kept on jamming. I only use "upmarket" housings even for compact cameras and strongly believe that while diving the better usability has more impact on my image quality than the latest camera model...
 

Back
Top Bottom